QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Wed 1st August 2007, 1:42pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
I think it's time to write a formal letter to the Board of Trustees of Wikimedia Foundation and request an investigation into the oversightings.
Complete waste of time. But if you want to, go for it.
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Wed 1st August 2007, 1:42pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Then if they respond, or fail to respond, there's enough to take it to the press, along with some of Jimbo's comments on the issue to date. I think the letter should come from Wikipedia Review.
I think that bringing up the Cohen book, and the DEA agent book, is very important. It is too easy to bash Pierre Salinger.
You'd have to get someone from the mainstream press to pick it up - what about the
Huffington Post? Why not blog there Daniel? That's a huge cross section of media and politics and it is very open. And has developed a great reputation based on internet-alone publication.
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Wed 1st August 2007, 1:42pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
I've been repeating myself over the last week like crazy. Virtually everything I've posted over the last week is old news. But it seems to be new to a lot of readers on this board, because they cannot find the old stuff.
Weren't you also saying things about Google, and then that was recognized later?
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Wed 1st August 2007, 1:42pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
I want to give Jimbo a chance to make some more zany comments.
Because that's something new? Jimbo says a lot of dumb things. Unfortunately, he's been interviewed in Newsweek this week, and that does him more weight. People still think that Wikia is going to produce a credible product - mostly because he's claiming he's going to unseat Google, which is pretty much the wackiest thing he's ever claimed.