I think this is quite an interesting question to ask.

Odd options.

Why not say "None, not even Wikipedia" then "Wikipedia only", etc?

And what do you count as web sites? And what do you count as banned?

Does a web forum count as a web site? If you can still post, does it count as being banned? What about an online mud?

I think, from memory, I was disallowed from 2 forums because they didn't like my application, I got banned from Citizendium because they think that I asked for it, I got banned from LiveJournal because I got hounded by LJ Drama, but then they undid the ban, but then they redid it, and then they said it was okay but haven't unwiped my journals. I got banned from uJournal because I got banned from LiveJournal. And I deleted my own BraveJournal account but wasn't banned. And I got banned from 2 muds and 5 talkers, although none of the bans are current. This is in 14 years of internet use.

More or less at the discretion of the poll taker.

* 2001 - Banned from LiveJournal (also because I was hounded by LJ Drama, LiveJournal.us and various trolls, apparently reacting to trolls gets you suspended) but I've been finding a way around that since 2004 (changing my username every once in a while to cover my tracks). I don't post anything there but comments and nothing that positively identifies me, which makes it difficult to track me down.
* 2002 - I was banned from another LiveJournal-type blog hosting site (ParaJournal.com, which no longer exists) because I was banned from LiveJournal (which makes no sense).
* 2003, then 2006 - Banned from yet another blog hosting site (DeadJournal.com) but at my own request. I used to work in Support there (though I knew what I was talking about more than most people there, I didn't exactly know how to talk to 'customers' very well, this is before I was diagnosed with anything) and other Support people were holding grudges against me for that so I didn't like the environment. Years later, I asked for an unbanning and tried to work with the owner, he still held a grudge against me for years (and I still didn't want to be in an environment where people hated me), so I asked for a re-banning.
* Probably 2003-4 - Banned from a mud ages ago, but I found a way around it several times (I'm not important enough for them to remember & I don't bother anymore, mudding has lost its appeal for me).
* 2006 - ED, of course. Apparently, defending myself is a blockable offense. All record of the block (and the user creation) seems to have mysteriously disappeared (so why haven't they removed User:Nathanr ?)
* 2007 - Banned from Blogshares.com because I tried to expose some admin abuse.

...all within the last 7 years of Internet use.

My vote is inaccurate but I can't change it, I don't think.

I was once banned from a blog called Quark Soup, which made little difference except to make the blog owner look like a dick.

He suddenly deleted the blog a few months later (because he wasn't getting the attention he craved).

He has since restarted Quark Soup but now nobody cares.

I put "Never banned, including Wikipedia." This is subject to the following caveat: I was indef blocked as User:GlassBeadGame, a SPA I created to protect my "real" WP account. This block was for criticizing SlimVirgin for making a clear legal threat against Daniel Brandt. The block made by Ryulong was in clear violation of WP policy. The statement criticizing SV was polite, non-disruptive and factual. The use of the SPA was permitted by WP policy. I will not lower myself to ask any admin to correct this minor injustice, although if any saw fit to unblock I would use the account to make non-disruptive criticisms of WP. The use of this SPA was successful in keeping my principal WP account free of controversy.

My principal account of approx. 2 years duration has never received as much a block and remains free of controversy. I have never been banned from any other site.

I post openly under my real name, both here and on Wikipedia, and have never received even a temporary block on Wikipedia. Over here, I was temporarily banned at one point, but am not currently under any sanction.

Wikipedia ???

I do declare,
there were times when I was so lonesome
I took some comfort there.
Lie lie lie lie lie lie lie

I do confess, while I'm in the box,
that I was trying for a while to get banned
from The Wikipedia Review,
but then I realized —

I need the eggs !!!

Jonny

I've been banned from tons of places, but mostly I was just having a good time, screwing around. I've never been banned from WP.

I have been banned several times, but mostly because of my position opposing forum lines. For exemple, few years ago, been banned from an insignificant Holocaust revisionist forum because I criticised a mod who deleted my posts exposing Rudolf uses of multiple identities to support his report, been banned from a fanatic white supremacist site because I criticised Rushton theories on r/K strategy applied to human. Been banned from 2 Turkish forums because I was speaking about the Armenian genocide. Been banned from 2 Azerbaijani forum because I admitted being Armenian(those bans were the most ridiculous). None of my bans were really related to personal attacks or the reasons given on Wikipedia, while it's true that I may be hot blooded a little bit, this was never the reason since I had to deal often with psycho's who were much more harsher than I and were made mods.

I answered none, but I realised I did actually get banned from a furry site that was featured on SA.coms awful site of the day. Went in there and abused them because I was bored.

Hasn't anyone who claims never to have been banned ever been on IRC? In some chat rooms, they ban people purely for entertainment regardless of whether you do anything wrong.


....
(unrelated below)
....


User:24.5.41.240 hadn't vandalized (or edited) for 34 days

User:24.5.41.240 makes one vandalistic edit and its block summary falsely claims "repeated vandalism for several days"




FURSECUTION!


You should put that story on your wikipedia userpage.

website no, but countless servers on a game i play. Mostly for breaking the "don't kill people when they don't want to die" rules. Or being too good. Its happened, even though i'm horribly average at the game

Lamont: If you want to count IRC, I know it's been once or twice (damned if I can remember, it's not recent - I rarely venture into other channels other than my own - and when I do, I'm usually pretty low-profile).

Useless fact: I've never been to #wikipedia, even when I was a user. It didn't interest me. I would rather talk to my own circle of friends on my own channel, and still do.

Too good?

Yeah, once, I beat this guy fairly on his server, repeatedly, so, he banned me.

That sounds like what the people banned from Metal Knights say. Although everyone else thinks that they were cheaters.

Well if you count IRC then yes, that too. Mainly for arguing with the christians in #christian-debate (i think). They didnt like the logical arguments I put forward.

Oh wait I almost forgot something. I was banned from ED. My offense was writing parody. This was a highly ritualized process that involved much imagery of people who I did not know having annal sex. I said, "ok I think I will move on now." But I was banned. So I need to change my vote to reflect this.

Annal Sex !?

Is this what the New Scholarship has come to ???

Jonny

Anal.

I got banned, along with Krimpet, from Conservapedia for saying "lulz" Oops ...

http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?tit...age=User:Alison

They unbanned me after & my account is still open.

Why did they ban people for that?

Is it because of this fox news report that says "lulz is a corruption of LOL"? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxWgRY1I_SI

HACKERS ON STEROIDS!!! BEWARE!!

ROFL!!!!!

Why did they ban people for saying, lulz, though? Considering that it is Conservapedia, it probably is the Fox News report.

I've no idea. Myself and K. joined up on the same day there was a massive influx from ED & we may have been collateral damage, I dunno. I got unblocked later but K. got banned again for uploading a conservape-tan pic and suggesting it as the new mascot. Oops!

I guess for those in the know, lulz has certain ... 'connotations'.