I need to correct what I said earlier about only having posted once to
the investigations list. I noticed tonight that I posted eight times
to a thread I'd forgotten about. Someone was having difficulty with a
technical issue, and I was trying to explain it. To the best of my
recollection, and so far I can see from my archives, that was the
extent of my involvement.

Sarah

I had almost nothing to do with the investigations list and have virtually no knowledge of it. My recollection is that I posted to it once, and that was recently to say I had no interest in it.

You can come here when you get banned, Moreschi. Heck, I'll even be nice to you!

So I guess Alison was lying.

Watch that avatar of hers...

So I guess Alison was lying.

Lying, was I? Point it out, plz.

Moulton was either being satirical or he's not keeping up. Slimey is carefully talking about the "investigations" list now, whereas Alison was talking about the "cyberstalking" list. You need an effing scorecard.

Moulton!?! Don't you mean Miltopia?

And everybody always confuses JzG and Jayjg.

And SV and Sarah.

This is a repost (but not a riposte).

My mistake. Alison was a paranoid conspirator, not a liar.

And everybody always confuses JzG and Jayjg.

Ah, so those on the list who have accounts here are in the clear? My mistake again.

Obviously, all regular contributors here are angels, even if one is fiery .

Obviously, all regular contributors here are angels, even if one is fiery .

My opinion of Moreschi is rapidly improving. This is fantastic.

SlimVirgin, one thing that you have still left unaddressed is how you are the administrator of WpCyberstalking - the Mailman page explicitly identified the sole administrator as "slimvirgin at gmail.com" until it was changed after its existence went public - and you yourself have been responsible for some of the most deplorable uses of the list, slinging mud at and defaming contributors to this project in a closed forum - I'm looking right at a post by you calling me a "troll enabler" and exhorting "Let the Krimpets block the good editors and unblock the stalkers." It is this kind of secret behavior that has the project up in arms, and why this matter goes far beyond the single unfortunate block of !!. --krimpet⟲ 21:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The elite crowd of vindictive edit warriors and POV-pushers have won. They control the content of our encyclopedia to suit their own points of view. They know all the right buttons to push, all the right strings to pull. They've got all the right connections, right up to those in charge. Make any effort to try to hold them accountable for their actions, keep them civil, offer constructive criticism, or anything of the sort, and they make sure you pay the price — as I've now learned firsthand.

Wikipedia is an amazing project. It deeply saddens me that it's slowly going down in flames. I really hope that someday, the community takes back their project from the hands of the vindictive elite.