Not too incidentally, let's look at what our favorite De Factory Of Original Policies has to say about the respective roles of primary sources and secondary sources —
QUOTE(Guy Chapman @ 08 Dec 2007 UTC 16:33)
So let's do what Wikipedia does: look at secondary sources. Please cite the analysis of this case in reliable secondary sources — not primary sources (the Reg), but secondary sources. Not that the Reg is reliable in the context of Wikipedia anyway, it displays a clear agenda here. So: where are the sources that discuss the dispute, including both sides, not just repeating the claims stated to be false by every single known member of the mailing list and every single known recipient of the Durova email? Guy (Help!) 16:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I really do hope that some people out there are starting to get the drift of what SlimVirgin's Theory Of Research (SV:TOR) is all about.
Jonny