Why's this never happen to Gary Weiss?
Read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...tion/Bluemarine
Full Version: Why's this never happen to Gary Weiss?
QUOTE
Bluemarine is a victim of harassment
3) Bluemarine has been harassed by single purpose accounts who have edited Matt Sanchez and associated pages in a hostile fashion.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
3) Bluemarine has been harassed by single purpose accounts who have edited Matt Sanchez and associated pages in a hostile fashion.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
QUOTE
Bluemarine banned
1) Bluemarine is banned from editing Wikipedia for a period of one year to run concurrently with the existing indefinite community ban.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
1) Bluemarine is banned from editing Wikipedia for a period of one year to run concurrently with the existing indefinite community ban.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
QUOTE(guy @ Sat 2nd February 2008, 2:54am) 
QUOTE
Bluemarine is a victim of harassment
3) Bluemarine has been harassed by single purpose accounts who have edited Matt Sanchez and associated pages in a hostile fashion.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
3) Bluemarine has been harassed by single purpose accounts who have edited Matt Sanchez and associated pages in a hostile fashion.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
QUOTE
Bluemarine banned
1) Bluemarine is banned from editing Wikipedia for a period of one year to run concurrently with the existing indefinite community ban.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
1) Bluemarine is banned from editing Wikipedia for a period of one year to run concurrently with the existing indefinite community ban.
Passed 8 to 0 03:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
But with that ruling, JzG, SV, Jayjg, Cberlet, and all other Cabalists should be banned by now.
"Arbcom: We're not even trying anymore." That should be their new slogan. And they are taking their sweet time trying to ban Giano.
The Cliqueistas love to cite ArbCom statements as if they were policy; they do it all the time with regard to BADSITES (though not as often these days, given that the case on that subject ended up so inconclusively; still, the older MONGO case occasionally gets cited). Next time somebody in the Clique insists on immunity for their own bad behavior on the grounds of their being the victim of harassment, everybody should cite this finding back at them.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.