More from Wiki defender (just noticed):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ul_discourse....
QUOTE
hopefully the page is fairly self-explanatory, but I thought I'd just make a note here if there are administrators interested in having a listen to some points and perspectives from editors who have been shown the door for various reasons from this project - then they can so at 'NotTheWikipediaWeekly' - thoughts and feedback most welcome..... Privatemusings (talk) 02:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This would be kindof like... allowing banned users to post, via ogg, no? NonvocalScream (talk) 03:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't think they are banned on Commons. I for one think this is a good idea. EconomicsGuy (talk) 05:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I think it might be interesting to hear the view that is usually rushed and cut off mid-sentence (so to speak) on wikipedia. And since the content will be reviewed (I assume) before posting, I don't see the issue. MBisanz talk 05:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh, you guys think it is a great idea? I think it is a great idea too...Who wouldn't think it is a great idea to give lying trolls and stalkers a pulpit from which they can berate us with their belligerent ballyhoo? Give me a break people! This is a no brainer. Cui bono? Who benefits from PM recording and posting his sickening perversions here? This podcast (or more aptly, this BADCAST) is arousing troll titillation--nothing more. If you do not believe that, then I have to prudently question your probity. This section should be renamed "PrivateMusing's attempt at arousing troll titillation and barbaric brouhahas...."—because that is what it is. Wilky DiFendare (talk) 06:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
And a very silly edit here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waitaki_Boys&...?diff=203236315QUOTE
Request reason: "I am a fearless and valiant vandal reverter and this accusation of vandalism is odious. Please point me to a diff where I have vandalised The Wikipedia. I am here to defend the wiki against trolls, stalkers, harassers, pranksters, buffoons and nincompoops. Do you disagree with my objectives? I am a fine upstanding Wikipedian. I don't understand why you are obstructing me from this goal. Please inform JzG of this block, for he is the moral compass of this Wiki and he will see this block for what it is: unjust, unrighteous and distasteful. I have a lot of work to do on behalf of some Great Wikipedians, please allow me to perform it. Wilky DiFendare (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)"
I am requesting the assistance of JzG per your request. Rudget (review) 18:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm certainly puzzled. Your edits are appropriate vandalism reversion, but your confusingly insulting edit-summaries and the confusingly disruptive post to the administrators' noticeboard are very strange, and your reference to Daniel Brandt makes it clear that you aren't new to Wikipedia. What was your previous username? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wilky_DiFendare"