Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Is Wikipedia Satanic?
> Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
wikiwhistle
Anton LaVey said his "Satanism" is ""just Ayn Rand's philosophy with ceremony and ritual added."

Jimbo Wales, a creator of Wikipedia, is allegedly into Randyanism smile.gif

Wikipedia has a lot of internal rituals (IslamOnline ) and perhaps ceremonies.

Therefore, is Wikipedia Satanic?
NVS
QUOTE(wikiwhistle @ Fri 30th May 2008, 4:25pm) *

Anton LaVey said his "Satanism" is ""just Ayn Rand's philosophy with ceremony and ritual added."

Jimbo Wales, a creator of Wikipedia, is allegedly into Randyanism smile.gif

Wikipedia has a lot of internal rituals and perhaps ceremonies.

Therefore, is Wikipedia Satanic?


Well... I've enjoyed this lapse out of reality. *Steps back into the world*

smile.gif
Gold heart
QUOTE(wikiwhistle @ Fri 30th May 2008, 5:25pm) *

Anton LaVey said his "Satanism" is ""just Ayn Rand's philosophy with ceremony and ritual added."

Jimbo Wales, a creator of Wikipedia, is allegedly into Randyanism smile.gif

Wikipedia has a lot of internal rituals and perhaps ceremonies.

Therefore, is Wikipedia Satanic?

FORUM Image

Anon Wikipedian administrator.


I suppose not everyone at Wikipedia is like that. The good are not heard much, that's why we don't see that much of them. rolleyes.gif

wikiwhistle
QUOTE(Gold heart @ Fri 30th May 2008, 5:34pm) *


I suppose not everyone at Wikipedia is like that. The good are not heard much, that's why we don't see that much of them. rolleyes.gif


Good pic lol smile.gif No I mean the structure as a whole, not the individual editors, who are mostly lovely.
Alison
QUOTE(wikiwhistle @ Fri 30th May 2008, 9:42am) *

QUOTE(Gold heart @ Fri 30th May 2008, 5:34pm) *


I suppose not everyone at Wikipedia is like that. The good are not heard much, that's why we don't see that much of them. rolleyes.gif


Good pic lol smile.gif No I mean the structure as a whole, not the individual editors, who are mostly lovely.

"Hate your enemies with a whole heart, and if a man smite you on the cheek, SMASH him on the other!" - Anton Szandor LaVey - The Satanic Bible

Hmmm - you could be right smile.gif
Gold heart
QUOTE(Alison @ Fri 30th May 2008, 5:59pm) *

QUOTE(wikiwhistle @ Fri 30th May 2008, 9:42am) *

QUOTE(Gold heart @ Fri 30th May 2008, 5:34pm) *


I suppose not everyone at Wikipedia is like that. The good are not heard much, that's why we don't see that much of them. rolleyes.gif


Good pic lol smile.gif No I mean the structure as a whole, not the individual editors, who are mostly lovely.

"Hate your enemies with a whole heart, and if a man smite you on the cheek, SMASH him on the other!" - Anton Szandor LaVey - The Satanic Bible

Hmmm - you could be right smile.gif

Very succinctly put. mellow.gif

I guess Anton Szandor LaVey is trying to grab some respectability by attaching himself to Rand's philosophies, which appear to be the antithesis of alturism. I guess Jimbo is more a spoiled brat, willing to make a buck out of any opportunity, whether porn, or other peoples endeavours. He doesn't care much about his "people", which is his main deficit to being a great leader. He'll get chewed up somewhere along the way, and become fabulously wealthy, and then have loads of time on hand to explore the Rand philosophy of the good life. wink.gif
Jon Awbrey
¤ shrug ¤

Jon cool.gif
thekohser
Okay, this should freak you all out.

Go to the website SemanticHacker.com.

In the "Input Text" field, paste the first two paragraphs from the Wikipedia article about Wikipedia:

QUOTE
Wikipedia (pronunciation ) is a free,[3] multilingual, open content encyclopedia project operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Its name is a portmanteau of the words wiki (a technology for creating collaborative websites) and encyclopedia. Launched in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger,[4] it is the largest, fastest-growing and most popular general reference work currently available on the Internet.[5][6]

As of April 2008, Wikipedia attracts 683 million visitors annually[7] reading over 10 million articles in 253 languages, comprising a combined total of over 1.74 billion words for all Wikipedias.[citation needed] The English Wikipedia edition passed the 2,000,000-article mark on September 9, 2007, and as of May 30, 2008 it had over 2,393,000 articles consisting of over 1,034,000,000 words.[1][not in citation given] Wikipedia's articles have been written collaboratively by volunteers around the world, and nearly all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet. Having steadily risen in popularity since its inception,[8] it currently ranks among the top ten most-visited web sites worldwide.


Click the "Submit" key.

Look at the Simplified Semantic Signature® that these paragraphs produce:

QUOTE
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 47
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 33
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 24
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals 23
.../Biology/Biochemistry_and_Molecular_Biology/Gene_Expression 23


This is something I discovered several days ago, but I was too afraid to be the first to break the news, as the Dark Lord is very powerful, indeed.

ph34r.gif
GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(wikiwhistle @ Fri 30th May 2008, 10:25am) *


Jimbo Wales, a creator of Wikipedia, is allegedly into Randyanism smile.gif



Wikipedia, organized under WMF as a non-profit corporation simply cannot be reconciled with Randism. Full stop. Because Wales continues to assert Rand as the principal basis for his beleifs, scarey enough in itself, it must be assumed that he is insincere in pursing WMF's stated mission. I have seen no better explaination than the project being a Giant Online Tom Sawyer's Fence (GOT_SF), in which Wales is supplied endless free labor to build a search engine or some other profit making project.

Anton LeVey is operating an entirely different baseless scam as far as I can tell.
Random832
QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 30th May 2008, 6:01pm) *



The word "Wikipedia" alone gives:
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 35
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 35
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 26
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals 25
Society/Folklore/Literature/Tales/Fabulous_Creatures 23

I'm guessing because there's not much about those topics in SemanticHacker's database but wikipedia articles, every one of which begins with "From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia."
thekohser
QUOTE(Random832 @ Fri 30th May 2008, 3:03pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 30th May 2008, 6:01pm) *



The word "Wikipedia" alone gives:
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 35
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 35
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 26
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals 25
Society/Folklore/Literature/Tales/Fabulous_Creatures 23

I'm guessing because there's not much about those topics in SemanticHacker's database but wikipedia articles, every one of which begins with "From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia."


You non-believer.

Actually, it might also be that it's confusing "wiki" with "wicca".

Greg
Random832
QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 30th May 2008, 8:29pm) *

QUOTE(Random832 @ Fri 30th May 2008, 3:03pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 30th May 2008, 6:01pm) *



The word "Wikipedia" alone gives:
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 35
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 35
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 26
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals 25
Society/Folklore/Literature/Tales/Fabulous_Creatures 23

I'm guessing because there's not much about those topics in SemanticHacker's database but wikipedia articles, every one of which begins with "From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia."


You non-believer.

Actually, it might also be that it's confusing "wiki" with "wicca".

Greg


Well, it gets much more reasonable results for "wiki" itself. The issue is, if their data is based in any part on wikipedia articles, there will be a substantial number of pages on nearly every topic that contain the word "wikipedia".

wiki:
Computers/Software/Groupware/Wiki/Wiki_Engines 63
Computers/Software/Groupware 40
Computers/Software/Groupware/Wiki/Topics 36
Computers/Open_Source/Hosting 16
Computers/Programming/Languages/C++ 16

look, "Free Encyclopedia" gets the same problem
Reference/Encyclopedias 40
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 33
.../Religion_and_Spirituality/Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism 28
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 22
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 21
Gold heart
Put in "Jimbo Wales"
QUOTE

.../Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism/Popes/Benedict_XVI
48Computers/Internet/Chat/Java 37Society/Ethnicity/Celtic/Welsh 28Arts/Animation/Cartoons/Titles/Simpsons,_The/Characters
27Arts/Animation/Cartoons

...Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism/Popes/Benedict_XVI

Popes? laugh.gif
darbyl
QUOTE(Gold heart @ Fri 30th May 2008, 3:02pm) *

Put in "Jimbo Wales"
QUOTE

.../Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism/Popes/Benedict_XVI
48Computers/Internet/Chat/Java 37Society/Ethnicity/Celtic/Welsh 28Arts/Animation/Cartoons/Titles/Simpsons,_The/Characters
27Arts/Animation/Cartoons

...Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism/Popes/Benedict_XVI

Popes? laughing.gif


Jimbo is the AntiPope.
UserB
QUOTE(Random832 @ Fri 30th May 2008, 3:03pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 30th May 2008, 6:01pm) *



The word "Wikipedia" alone gives:
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 35
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 35
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 26
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals 25
Society/Folklore/Literature/Tales/Fabulous_Creatures 23

I'm guessing because there's not much about those topics in SemanticHacker's database but wikipedia articles, every one of which begins with "From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia."


Yep, that must be it. If you put in "Wikia", you get:

.../Television/Programs/Science_Fiction_and_Fantasy/Star_Trek_Series 100
Computers/Internet/Searching 4
Computers/Software/Groupware 3
Science/Environment/Air_Quality/Air_Dispersion_Modeling 1
Games/Video_Games/Simulation/God_Games/Creatures_Series 1

I'm assuming that Memory Alpha is the biggest, most popular, most linked to, etc site on Wikia and thus it thinks the word Wikia has something to do with Star Trek.
wikiwhistle
QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 30th May 2008, 7:01pm) *

Okay, this should freak you all out.

Go to the website SemanticHacker.com.

In the "Input Text" field, paste the first two paragraphs from the Wikipedia article about Wikipedia {...}

Look at the Simplified Semantic Signature® that these paragraphs produce:

QUOTE
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 47
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 33
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 24
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals 23
.../Biology/Biochemistry_and_Molecular_Biology/Gene_Expression 23


This is something I discovered several days ago, but I was too afraid to be the first to break the news, as the Dark Lord is very powerful, indeed.

ph34r.gif


The other examples people give make that site seem to give results which are quite random. But- woah, just woah, that is truly freaky. Do you think we could find some more evidence of the dark Satanic Truth about wiki if we studied the article on Wikipedia written backwards too?
Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Gold heart @ Fri 30th May 2008, 10:40am) *

I guess Anton Szandor LaVey is trying to grab some respectability by attaching himself to Rand's philosophies
"Satan was unavailable, so we had to settle for Ayn Rand."
wikiwhistle
WTF?

"This is an open forum is provided for people to talk about issues related to Wikipedia and sister projects like Wiktionary and Wikimedia Commons without the possibility of censorship by the Wikimedia Foundation openly-undemocratic administration ("Voting is evil" --Jimbo Wales)." (from the FAQ of this forum- I took the "welcome to WR bit off in case that's what ws causing the problem.)

Simplified semantic signature

.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 47
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 44
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content 32
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 23
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals

We get the demons at the top! Does this mean WR is officially more evil? Or is it because I've mentioned them a couple of times lol
Gold heart
QUOTE(darbyl @ Fri 30th May 2008, 11:06pm) *

QUOTE(Gold heart @ Fri 30th May 2008, 3:02pm) *

Put in "Jimbo Wales"
QUOTE

.../Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism/Popes/Benedict_XVI
48Computers/Internet/Chat/Java 37Society/Ethnicity/Celtic/Welsh 28Arts/Animation/Cartoons/Titles/Simpsons,_The/Characters
27Arts/Animation/Cartoons

...Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism/Popes/Benedict_XVI

Popes? laugh.gif

Jimbo is the AntiPope.

Is this Jimbo's secret ritual mantra? "die kiwi pa" ohmy.gif

Jon Awbrey
I think you guys are forgetting the first rule of the professional pusher — a professional pusher being one who is still in business after a year or so:
  • The dopiate you push is not equal to the dopiate you smoke.

Jimbo pushes that Randy dope because it's what his target market already buys.

Jon cool.gif
LessHorrid vanU
QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 30th May 2008, 7:01pm) *

Okay, this should freak you all out.

Go to the website SemanticHacker.com.

In the "Input Text" field, paste the first two paragraphs from the Wikipedia article about Wikipedia:

QUOTE
Wikipedia (pronunciation ) is a free,[3] multilingual, open content encyclopedia project operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Its name is a portmanteau of the words wiki (a technology for creating collaborative websites) and encyclopedia. Launched in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger,[4] it is the largest, fastest-growing and most popular general reference work currently available on the Internet.[5][6]

As of April 2008, Wikipedia attracts 683 million visitors annually[7] reading over 10 million articles in 253 languages, comprising a combined total of over 1.74 billion words for all Wikipedias.[citation needed] The English Wikipedia edition passed the 2,000,000-article mark on September 9, 2007, and as of May 30, 2008 it had over 2,393,000 articles consisting of over 1,034,000,000 words.[1][not in citation given] Wikipedia's articles have been written collaboratively by volunteers around the world, and nearly all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet. Having steadily risen in popularity since its inception,[8] it currently ranks among the top ten most-visited web sites worldwide.


Click the "Submit" key.

Look at the Simplified Semantic Signature® that these paragraphs produce:

QUOTE
Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Encyclopedias/Wikipedia 47
.../Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Demonolatry/Demons 33
.../History/By_Time_Period/Ancient/Rome/People/Roman_Emperors 24
Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Spiritual_Beings/Elementals 23
.../Biology/Biochemistry_and_Molecular_Biology/Gene_Expression 23


This is something I discovered several days ago, but I was too afraid to be the first to break the news, as the Dark Lord is very powerful, indeed.

ph34r.gif


I honestly believe that the Star Wars related obsession of a significant percentage of the WP editorship does the encyclopedia's credibility a great deal of damage.



What?

There's another Dark Lord?

Um... So what is it? Is it a heavy metal band? A Poul Anderson character? A particularly vicious dildo?

Oh... him/it. My mistake...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.