QUOTE(Giggy @ Sun 29th June 2008, 2:44am)
I saw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contr...ns/Pikachu_Cash vandalising on the admin noticeboard (which is on my watchlist) and, a few minutes later, checked recent changes on Commons, only to find him registering an account and uploading some anime pron. I deleted his image and
blocked - the response: accusations of
vandalism.
Seems Persian Poet Gal wasn't as
lucky.
Ah. The old
"vandalism comprises edits I don't agree with" trick.
Sly, sly dogs those guys...
Me, I just think you are lucky they didn't
play the CYBERTERRORISM card. See here:
That's when they
REALLY REALLY REALLY don't agree with your edits. otherwise, they could have accused you of [
cyberstalking and harassment, but that's girly stuff.
Right Sarah? Speaking of Cyberterrorism, I found this nifty definition
What Is Cyberterrorism?
Cyberterrorism is the convergence of cyberspace and terrorism. It refers to unlawful attacks and threats of attacks against computers, networks and the information stored therein when done to intimidate or coerce a government or its people in furtherance of political or social objectives. Further, to qualify as cyberterrorism, an attack should result in violence against persons or property, or at least cause enough harm to generate fear. Attacks that lead to death or bodily injury, explosions, or severe economic loss would be examples. Serious attacks against critical infrastructures could be acts of cyberterrorism, depending on their impact. Attacks that disrupt nonessential services or that are mainly a costly nuisance would not.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....
Sounds like some
IW bloggers and online official people I know from Wikiped ... (oh never mind)...