I know it's a couple of months old now, but this is the best hoax ever. C'mon, who was it?

The consensus was the article should be kept.

The consensus was the article should be kept.

And once again, we see a Wikipedian blissfully allowed to promote a Wikia, Inc. alternate site for content considered questionable on WP.

In contrast, when another user suggested that people come to a site that I happened to be marketing, they were quite nearly banned.

More hypocrisy in the Wikia/Wikipedia/WMF cult -- it's okay to use the non-profit space to promote Wikia; it's practically a block-worthy offense to promote a similar non-Wikia site.

It's all about Der Jimbo. And he cries that I'm stalking him. Waaah waaah waaahhh!

It is believed that wet-floor signs were first used (albeit with far less beauty and style) at the dawn of the Floor Age. As soon as floors were introduced in Roman times, it is likely that they began getting wet–whether caused by water, vomit, urine, or any other liquid. It was only a matter of time before it was understood that a sign would prevent a pedestrian from slipping on the wet floor. Historians of the Roman period point to the introduction of wet floor signs (approximately 220 B.C.) as one of the main causes of the decreased rate of ankle-sprains among Romans, thus allowing the Republic to expand into an empire with its far larger healthy population.