Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Public sex image: or how to libel an anonymous man
> Wikimedia Discussion > Articles
Carruthers
On the Wikipedia article for "Public Sex", an image has been added : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:A_man_r...Fire_Island.jpg

The caption is :
QUOTE
In the infamous 'meatrack' on Fire Island Pines, a man waits for sex.


First of all, I don't see a model release here. I do see an identifiable face. And who is to say what this man is doing there? Even if he is "waiting for sex", does he want this information posted into the number 7 website in the World?

What is this image doing on an encyclopedia in the first place?
maggot3
No surprise that David Shankbone uploaded and added this image.
carbuncle
QUOTE(Carruthers @ Fri 5th September 2008, 9:13pm) *

First of all, I don't see a model release here. I do see an identifiable face.


Did you try blowing it up real big? The face is obscured.
Pumpkin Muffins
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Fri 5th September 2008, 2:39pm) *

QUOTE(Carruthers @ Fri 5th September 2008, 9:13pm) *

First of all, I don't see a model release here. I do see an identifiable face.


Did you try blowing it up real big? The face is obscured.

But the unobscured version of the image (the original upload) is still online.
Carruthers
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Fri 5th September 2008, 9:39pm) *

QUOTE(Carruthers @ Fri 5th September 2008, 9:13pm) *

First of all, I don't see a model release here. I do see an identifiable face.


Did you try blowing it up real big? The face is obscured.


I saw the initial image, but even this image is identifiable.

Who is to say what this man is doing and why he's there. There is no "public sex" in the image. It's just a gratuitous image meant to push buttons on any number of levels.
carbuncle
QUOTE(Pumpkin Muffins @ Fri 5th September 2008, 9:41pm) *

QUOTE(carbuncle @ Fri 5th September 2008, 2:39pm) *

QUOTE(Carruthers @ Fri 5th September 2008, 9:13pm) *

First of all, I don't see a model release here. I do see an identifiable face.


Did you try blowing it up real big? The face is obscured.

But the unobscured version of the image (the original upload) is still online.


DOh! So it is, so it is. Serves me right for defending David Shankbone.
lolwut
What is it with that guy?

This is clearly a helpful, encyclopedic image. No, really, it illustrates the actual making of a gay pornography film far better than gay pornography itself would, because it gives an insight into the reality of it being made, rather than the homoerotic fantasies I expect such films might contain (don't ask me, I don't watch gay porn).
dogbiscuit
QUOTE(maggot3 @ Fri 5th September 2008, 10:21pm) *

No surprise that David Shankbone uploaded and added this image.

No surprise he was there to take the picture.
Milton Roe
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Sat 6th September 2008, 9:57am) *

QUOTE(maggot3 @ Fri 5th September 2008, 10:21pm) *

No surprise that David Shankbone uploaded and added this image.

No surprise he was there to take the picture.

Something to do whilst waiting, himself? smile.gif
The Wales Hunter
This is the same person who photographed a homeless person inserting a tampon, so it doesn't surprise me at all.
Cedric
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sat 6th September 2008, 3:58pm) *

QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Sat 6th September 2008, 9:57am) *

QUOTE(maggot3 @ Fri 5th September 2008, 10:21pm) *

No surprise that David Shankbone uploaded and added this image.

No surprise he was there to take the picture.

Something to do whilst waiting, himself? smile.gif

Could be. I wouldn't be that surprised if it is a pic of himself--all he would have needed was a tripod and a timer. I am very doubtful that Slim Shanky did a "courtesy obscure" on that pic of a homeless lady inserting a tampon in an alley, which is why I'm suspicious.
The Wales Hunter
QUOTE(Cedric @ Sat 6th September 2008, 10:13pm) *

...that pic of a homeless lady inserting a tampon in an alley...


Must have been a huge tampon to fit in an alley tongue.gif
Cedric
QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Sat 6th September 2008, 9:06pm) *

QUOTE(Cedric @ Sat 6th September 2008, 10:13pm) *

...that pic of a homeless lady inserting a tampon in an alley...


Must have been a huge tampon to fit in an alley tongue.gif

Well, it was big enough to fit in her alley, anyway. *rimshot*

Thank you! I'll be here all week.
Rootology
QUOTE(ByAppointmentTo @ Fri 5th September 2008, 4:05pm) *

What is it with that guy?

This is clearly a helpful, encyclopedic image. No, really, it illustrates the actual making of a gay pornography film far better than gay pornography itself would, because it gives an insight into the reality of it being made, rather than the homoerotic fantasies I expect such films might contain (don't ask me, I don't watch gay porn).


Oddly, THIS image I do think is encyclopediac. I never really thought there would be that many people with filming gear up in practically the faces of the actors making a porno. WP has tons of images of film crews at work scattered throughout. I don't think I've seen one before of a porno one. This image isn't bad, on that basis. I just wish he'd pulled back a little more to see the overhead lighting that you can barely see on the top right, to get a sense of scale a little more.

QUOTE(Carruthers @ Fri 5th September 2008, 2:13pm) *

On the Wikipedia article for "Public Sex", an image has been added : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:A_man_r...Fire_Island.jpg

The caption is :
QUOTE
In the infamous 'meatrack' on Fire Island Pines, a man waits for sex.


First of all, I don't see a model release here. I do see an identifiable face. And who is to say what this man is doing there? Even if he is "waiting for sex", does he want this information posted into the number 7 website in the World?


I'm staring at this image trying to decide how identifiable he may be...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.