Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Wikipedia Threatens to Delete List of Bilderberg Attendees
> Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
Dzonatas
I didn't see this pop up in the newsfeed. Several sites have run this story.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/wikipedia-thre...-attendees.html

Despite the sources and where the news comes from, there are many notable people that have attended.

I'll stay neutral on this issue but wanted to point it out for those that missed it yesterday.
EricBarbour
Hah! "This article does not cite any references or sources"
followed by a long list of references.

But I still have problems with anything on Prison Planet.
Alex Jones is not entirely to be trusted, any more than other
conspiracy freaks. He's discovered something disgusting:
one can make a lot of money fueling the paranoia of
American baby boomers.

Flap, flap, flap.

And furthermore, one of the listed attendees, "Lord Black of Crossharbour" yecch.gif ,
is currently in federal prison.
Anonymous editor
yeah, someone added a PROD tag and someone else removed it. SHOCKING NEWS!


Found something funny in the comments, though.

QUOTE
Actually wikipedia is nothing more or nothing less than a citizens dictionary. If somebody wants to infiltrate it, the road is clear to do so. There is no guarantee any article is free from government infiltration. Anyway, many articles over there are good. But some of them are not.

As byzantine pointed out, the NSA and CIA made the mistake of hiding behind one single nick,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SlimVirgin

All their entries can be traced to that one nick. Really, really bad move there. It really exposes their agenda watching the edits of “SlimVirgin”.


laugh.gif
Dzonatas
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sat 14th February 2009, 5:18pm) *

Alex Jones is not entirely to be trusted, any more than other


I started to watch Alex Jones up until the point where he made the Eugenics argument for NWO. The whole Eugenics theory has been debunked back to the Holocaust era. In order for him to believe in Eugenics goes against the beliefs of the Holocaust.

His sites and crew are informative for sources, but beyond that I don't buy into his ideology.
Milton Roe
QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Sat 14th February 2009, 7:14pm) *

QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sat 14th February 2009, 5:18pm) *

Alex Jones is not entirely to be trusted, any more than other


I started to watch Alex Jones up until the point where he made the Eugenics argument for NWO. The whole Eugenics theory has been debunked back to the Holocaust era. In order for him to believe in Eugenics goes against the beliefs of the Holocaust.

Eugenics got smeared by association with the Nazis, but that's a sort of Godwin's Law thing. Most of the evil things the Nazis did, aren't necessary to the basic ideas of eugenics.

Today, we've had to rename a lot of eugenic ideas and they go under the headings of planned parenthood, genetic counceling, genetic engineering, and the like. When given the free choice, very few parents would really deliberately refuse technologies to eliminate genetic diseases.

Or course, that's not everybody. Here in the US we recently had a nearly brainless woman have eight babies at a time, to give her a total of 14. Many with defects, and none of them paid for.

At times like this I think of Cyril Kornbluth's old tales of The Marching Morons and wonder if he wasn't onto something. I have the feeling I'm being outbred. Happy 200th, Darwin.
Hipocrite
Yeah, I nominated the article because it was a craptastic list of people that may or may not have gone to a conference, mostly unsourced. You could add anyone you wanted to the list with or without reference and your addition would stick. It's a blight, it's conspiracrap, and it's a massive BLP violation.

But that's the kind of thing this site supports/opposes/supports/opposes, right?
EricBarbour
QUOTE(Hipocrite @ Sat 14th February 2009, 6:55pm) *
But that's the kind of thing this site supports/opposes/supports/opposes, right?

Yeah, only if it's not Cabal-Approved Wiki-Shit.

Since this relates to NWO/Bilderburger conspiracies, and not to Ayn Rand,
Israeli hyper-Zionism, the magical CIA, or other Cabal favorites,
it might get a passing Review grade as a subject.

(Despite being paranoid crazy talk, of course. yecch.gif )

I do like that smiley. It suits this subject matter well. yecch.gif yecch.gif yecch.gif yecch.gif yecch.gif

QUOTE
At times like this I think of Cyril Kornbluth's old tales of The Marching Morons and
wonder if he wasn't onto something. I have the feeling I'm being outbred.

Kornbluth woulda loved Idiocracy. (Despite being a ripoff of his work.)
Sadly, he might also mistake most recent Hollywood blockbusters
for sequels to Idiocracy. And "reality television" would send him
screaming into the night.

Ever read The Space Merchants?
Even more complete and accurate futurism than The Marching Morons.
Closer to what we have today. sad.gif
Bottled_Spider
QUOTE(Dzonatas @ Sun 15th February 2009, 2:14am) *
I started to watch Alex Jones up until the point where he made the Eugenics argument for NWO.

NWO. I'd take a guess and say you mean New World Order? But there's a lot of stuff that could mean as well. It's the fascist/socialist world-government thing, isn't it? Or maybe the Jones guy is into racially-pure wrestling?
QUOTE
In order for him to believe in Eugenics goes against the beliefs of the Holocaust.

The Holocaust has beliefs?
Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sat 14th February 2009, 6:34pm) *

Eugenics got smeared by association with the Nazis, but that's a sort of Godwin's Law thing.
dry.gif No, it's not. The Nazi movement would have died out early in its history without ever coming to power, were it not for the assistance, financial and otherwise, of powerful figures in the eugenics movement (including the Harriman family and hangers-on such as Prescott Bush.)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.