"Results of the survey on use of Wikipedia by the scholarly community
Methodology: The survey below was publicized from February 18 to
February 26, 2009 initially in a blog and newsletter update by the
Public Library of Science. It was picked up by various science blogs
and was also distributed by at least one forum dedicated to criticisms
of Wikipedia."If you actually save the PDF file, then right-click for its "Properties", you'll discover in the meta-data that the file originated with:
"Title: Strategic Plan and Proposal for Institutional Funding:
Wikimedia Foundation
Author: James Larrue-Baulch"
Now, a little sleuthing and you'll discover that Larrue-Baulch points to
Arcana, a Toronto-based strategic business consultancy. Sue Gardner went to college in Toronto, and her job at the CBC was right there at 250 Front Street in Toronto.
So, what's Erik Moeller doing with a file that was at one time prepared by Arcana?
Anyway, you all should be delighted to learn that
Wikipedia Review even won mention in this august report summary:
QUOTE
As noted above, the survey was mentioned in at least one Internet forum dedicated generally to criticisms of Wikipedia, which resulted in some small clusters of entirely or almost entirely negative responses. These approximately 10-20 responses could be identified due to the timerange in which they occurred, but did not significantly affect the result and were not removed from the sample.