Some light relief

Ha. The Vandal Fighters and New Page Patrollers must be up in arms!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=284522443

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=288672075

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=288642907

Ha ha ha

lol

So that's where that was coming from

They must not have expected it to stick as they didn't even attempt sourcing. Wikipeans just can't understand sourcing and would probably link the cartoon as a source. Reading a cartoon and then citing that cartoon is not a "source." It is original research. They need to cite WR.

I think a similar question came up elsewhere in article-space, leading certain individuals to suggest that original research (or at least the appearance thereof) is okay if the alternative is linking to a BADSITE. Maybe things have changed at least slightly since then.