QUOTE(One @ Fri 11th September 2009, 9:49am)
QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 11th September 2009, 11:20am)
You're clearly
not informed of the facts.
Oh, I see that you are. Sorry about that.
Well, when I click the link, his comment is still there. I'm not sure how to otherwise explain that.
Maybe you could take a screen shot of how YOU see the page, if that wouldn't cause GBG to report us to the police?
Perhaps Jimbo has a special button (developed by a volunteer, I'm sure) that he can click to "Hide this post from trolls".
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Fri 11th September 2009, 9:52am)
Looks to me that both Greg's and Mr. Wales' posts might run afoul of
Facebook's ToS. Jimbo probably violated
(3) Saftey (10) You will not use Facebook to do anything unlawful, misleading, malicious, or discriminatory. It is also arguable, although less clear, that Greg violated
(5) Protecting Other People's Rights (7) If you collect information from users, you will: obtain their consent, make it clear you (and not Facebook) are the one collecting their information, and post a privacy policy explaining what information you collect and how you will use it.
So how and why exactly was Mr. Wales' post removed?
I'd say Wales was more guilty of:
You will not send or otherwise post unauthorized commercial communications (such as spam) on Facebook.