Full Version: List of mainstream movies with unsimulated sex
List of mainstream movies with unsimulated sex -- another example of Wikipedia excelling in its "niche market."
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 7th October 2009, 7:11am) 
List of mainstream movies with unsimulated sex -- another example of Wikipedia excelling in its "niche market."
With a wonderful example of Wikipedia redefinition of the dictionary to suit its purposes. I had a vague idea that mainstream movies would be ones people might possibly have heard of, with the likes of the memorable under-age sex scene from Escape to Witch Mountain, the censored buggery scene from Mary Poppins and the wide-ranging bestiality depicted in Monsters Inc.*
* May contain some elements of WP:OR
Who was it said "When I use a word it means whatever I want it to mean"?
QUOTE(Appleby @ Wed 7th October 2009, 5:18pm)
Who was it said "When I use a word it means whatever I want it to mean"?
Humpty Dumpty.
QUOTE(Appleby @ Wed 7th October 2009, 12:18pm)
Who was it said "When I use a word it means whatever I want it to mean"?
George W. Bush?
QUOTE(Malleus @ Wed 7th October 2009, 12:32pm)
QUOTE(Appleby @ Wed 7th October 2009, 5:18pm)
Who was it said "When I use a word it means whatever I want it to mean"?
Humpty Dumpty.
Eggcellent!
The article isn't well-cited, but whoever wrote it appears to know what they're talking about. I'll safely and self-servingly reserve judgement on whether that means the article is a credit to Wikipedia or not.
One clear problem is the article is titled: "List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex" yet there are sections on:
# 2 Films showing real object penetration
# 3 Films showing other actual sexual activity
# 4 Pornographic films reedited as mainstream releases
# 5 Television series with genuine sexual activity
Which are not related to the title!
# 2 Films showing real object penetration
# 3 Films showing other actual sexual activity
# 4 Pornographic films reedited as mainstream releases
# 5 Television series with genuine sexual activity
Which are not related to the title!
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 8th October 2009, 10:08am)
The article isn't well-cited, but whoever wrote it appears to know what they're talking about. I'll safely and self-servingly reserve judgement on whether that means the article is a credit to Wikipedia or not.
I can vouch for the Caligula entry at least.
ROWR.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.