Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Stereotypes of highly-committed Wikipedia editors
> Wikimedia Discussion > Articles
gomi
Damn! I missed this article before it got deleted. Probably was a hoot.

An anon got in a good one though -- a cite to a psych journal article: Psychologist finds Wikipedians grumpy and closed-minded. In other news Sun continues to rise in East!

dogbiscuit
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 21st October 2009, 8:15am) *

Damn! I missed this article before it got deleted. Probably was a hoot.

An anon got in a good one though -- a cite to a psych journal article: Psychologist finds Wikipedians grumpy and closed-minded. In other news Sun continues to rise in East!

Closed by Jayjg. Thought he had gone underground.

Must keep up.
John Limey
Not too much to it.
QUOTE

In a clear indication of the extent to which Wikipedia has permeated the popular consciousness of the developed world, the stereotype of a highly committed Wikipedia editor is now quite commonly understood. That some individuals consider the unusually persistent editor to be a humorous idea is demonstrated by the fact that this concept has even been discussed in mainstream, profit-seeking media.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/apr/10/wikipedia.internet</ref>

Whether it is a sub-set of the apparently humorous idea of a individual who spends large amounts of time with their computer, or merely a observation that editing highly obscure articles is relatively useless to general society, enough humour has been found in the concept of a wiki-editing subculture that this comic idea has persisted for a number of years. <ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/17/internet.digitalmedia</ref>

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.