QUOTE(Nerd @ Tue 10th November 2009, 10:45pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 10th November 2009, 9:13pm)
No wonder wikipedia needs an army of administrators just to keep it functioning at all, never mind well.
What's this? Malleus is actually suggesting admins are slightly useful?
I do agree of course. We have far too much junk on Wikipedia that's displayed in the guise of an article. The ARS gang will try to save every article they possibly can (yes, I meant save), regardless of its merits, usefulness or notability. "If it exists, it is notable".
Yeah, I feel a bit sheepish in saying that, I have to admit.
In my defence though, my view has always been that the current system demands an army of administrators that with a little bit of common sense ought not to be needed. Anyone who doubts that's true ought to spend a couple of hours patrolling new pages to convince them otherwise.