Regarding this AfD...

At what point do we actually draw a line in the sand -- when does the encyclopedia stop and the trivia grab bag begin? Or is Wikipedia doomed to be a hodgepodge of endless nonsense, including articles about someone celebrated for "his almost-hairless, tanned muscular body" that was used when he "performed exclusively in the top role in anal sex with men, but performed in both the top and bottom roles in oral sex"?

And that doesn't touch the appropriateness of having a minor being responsible for relisting this worthy debate.

I believe this article should be kept if only because of the movie title Bi 'N Large.

Yeah, but which character does the beefy Mr. Correa play?