Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Wikipedia Down
> Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
John Limey
It seems that Wikipedia is down, but only the English version and has been for a while (Mashable, Huffington Post). The twitter chat about it is very interesting, and I've seen no explanation of what happened.
A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(John Limey @ Wed 24th March 2010, 2:07pm) *

It seems that Wikipedia is down, but only the English version and has been for a while (Mashable, Huffington Post). The twitter chat about it is very interesting, and I've seen no explanation of what happened.


It is online -- I just checked out the new featured atrocity...uh, article. ermm.gif
Moulton
Probably what went down is the DNS (Domain Name Service). If you happened to have a recently cached DNS lookup, the site loaded just fine (as long as the page didn't reference media from a sister site).
Somey
Ah, but fr that one shining moment, we had an ever-so-fleeting, ever-so-sweet taste of the World That Might Have Been.
SirFozzie
Looks like a DNS issue/router drop somewhere, as depending on the area you're in, it either comes up or not.
Apathetic
For the truly addicted, the following lines can be added to one's local hosts file:

208.80.152.2 en.wikipedia.org
208.80.152.3 upload.wikimedia.org
Doc glasgow
Still down for me (UK)

QUOTE
Server not found

Firefox can't find the server at en.wikipedia.org.
carbuncle
From the WP techblog, which is likely unreachable for some of you:
QUOTE
Global Outage (cooling failure and DNS)

Posted by mark in wikimedia on March 24th, 2010

Due to an overheating problem in our European data center many of our servers turned off to protect themselves. As this impacted all Wikipedia and other projects access from European users, we were forced to move all user traffic to our Florida cluster, for which we have a standard quick failover procedure in place, that changes our DNS entries.

However, shortly after we did this failover switch, it turned out that this failover mechanism was now broken, causing the DNS resolution of Wikimedia sites to stop working globally. This problem was quickly resolved, but unfortunately it may take up to an hour before access is restored for everyone, due to caching effects.

We apologize for the inconvenience this has caused.
Basil
Exquisite FAIL.
Kelly Martin
I wonder if this is related to lists.wikimedia.org being dead.

QUOTE(Basil @ Wed 24th March 2010, 1:50pm) *
Exquisite FAIL.
Wikimedia IT is barely competent. While they do a good job of throwing excessively large amounts of hardware at their grotesquely inefficient software, they have very poor disaster planning and apparently don't do test runs, either. smile.gif

They're in good company, though; over 50% of corporations have no meaningful IT disaster planning.
Moulton
At least they bother to report the failures that turn up in the wake of unplanned, accidental breaching experiments.
Milton Roe
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Wed 24th March 2010, 11:44am) *

From the WP techblog, which is likely unreachable for some of you:
QUOTE
Global Outage (cooling failure and DNS)

Posted by mark in wikimedia on March 24th, 2010

Due to an overheating problem in our European data center many of our servers turned off to protect themselves. As this impacted all Wikipedia and other projects access from European users, we were forced to move all user traffic to our Florida cluster, for which we have a standard quick failover procedure in place, that changes our DNS entries.

However, shortly after we did this failover switch, it turned out that this failover mechanism was now broken, causing the DNS resolution of Wikimedia sites to stop working globally. This problem was quickly resolved, but unfortunately it may take up to an hour before access is restored for everyone, due to caching effects.

We apologize for the inconvenience this has caused.


Interesting. I can reach it by going through the main-main page, THEN to en.wiki, but not directly from en.wiki.

Once on, a lot of the image/files in the articles do not show for me. That must be related to the caching problem.
Ottava
QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 24th March 2010, 6:17pm) *

Ah, but fr that one shining moment, we had an ever-so-fleeting, ever-so-sweet taste of the World That Might Have Been.


Ah, the sound of a thousand admins in anguish because they were wanting to block someone into submission to make up for a life that did not amount to their expectations but they were left without that ability for a few moments.
Apathetic
apparently the secure server was receiving too much overflow so they shut it down too =\

...meaning I'm unable to complete my application for a free trip to Poland!
thekohser
QUOTE(Basil @ Wed 24th March 2010, 2:50pm) *

Exquisite FAIL.


Good thing they stuff about 40% of their revenues in the bank, rather than spend on technology that easily 80% of donors think is the target of their donation!
LessHorrid vanU
... and we have reception (for the time being). Most of the blogs have been having a chuckle about it, which was fairly entertaining.
NuclearWarfare
User:Bigtimepeace/WikipediaDownMarch2010

Bigtimepeace put together a set of Twitter "tweets" during the time of the tech problems. It's...quite entertaining to read.
MZMcBride
QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Wed 24th March 2010, 8:46pm) *
QUOTE(Apathetic @ Wed 24th March 2010, 4:01pm) *
apparently the secure server was receiving too much overflow so they shut it down too =\

...meaning I'm unable to complete my application for a free trip to Poland!
What?
Wikimania scholarships are open.
gomi
[Moderator's note: about seven zero-content posts were deleted.]
bambi
Wikipedia-watch.org picked up some extra eyeballs due to Wikipedia's problem. The usual of about 550 home-page visitors per day jumped to 4632 yesterday. That's because www.wikipedia-watch.org ranks about 8 on Google in a search for the single word "wikipedia." When they couldn't reach Wikipedia, they tried "wikipedia" on Google, and figured that Wikipedia-Watch might have some breaking news about this happy occasion. After all, isn't a "watch" site supposed to be watching? wtf.gif laugh.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.