Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.

You cannot view this diff because one or both of the revisions have been removed from the public archives.

There may be details in the deletion log.

- This is to stay here but also to be moved onto main page! This again proves my point from yesterday, i simply was reverting double edit and no good administrators like tim song reverted it, in this story you will find out exactly what i mean and what is long overdue fixing on wikipedia: I do not know where to start because the list is never-ending, problem with this user goes back all the way to 2005. This will not be post to enjoy, so bear with us, you are about to read nothing but the truth, supported with undeniable proof.

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy no privacy on wikipeedia according to antandrus & those who support him. Antandrus goes public with people's real names, here he reverted the name: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=241207095 mirandamir reverted it back, then antandrus BLOCKED THE TALK PAGE, on purpose, knowing he will provoke situation, then he uses those statements to prove his point how he is innocent, how he is only doing his "job". ANTANDRUS MAIN REASON BEHIND BLOCKS IS TO CREATE PROBLEMS! Antandrus is wikiholic, he admitted if he does not revert something within 12 hours he will not feel good. In real life he has no life, no real job. On wikinews he claims he has phd, he claimed same thing here (REMEMBER ESSJAY LIES & SIDE EFFECTS?) en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:Antandrus but i'd like to see prove with his real name. I hope you will not take anything down here, thats against policies, we're simply trying to make our point clear. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340162039

did he say thanx for edits and contributions, instead he wrote
good editor is dinking around, what kind of language is that,

certainly not civil, - against any wikipedia policities! Assuming good now blocked contributer (thanx to u know whom) chessmasta made one bad edit, but made 100 good edits, the one bad edit is huge crime according to antandrus, even arguin on talk page is crime, even if proven right. -

Reverts of good edits: - Antandrus has been vindalizing crosswikis & other webpages on the internet, not to mention putting his link on other pages just so he can promote his (like controler site, that has now been closed for good, good news) lowly websites.

http://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=...2&oldid=1100001
in this edit, it's clear mr antandrus has no knowledge of world

history, according to him churchill never participated in any wars, instead of correcting spellin, he reverted, later he did it BUT with bowed head, only after he was reported to administrator for revert violations.

Antandrus not once said thank you for good edits, never warned,

only blocked:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340178696
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340162039
did he say thanx for edits and contributions? instead he wrote

- dinking around, what kind of language is that, certainly it's not civil, - against any wikipedia policities! Assuming good now blocked contributer (thanx to u know whom) chessmasta made one bad edit, but made 100 good edits, the one bad edit is huge crime according to antandrus, even arguin on talk page is crime, even if proven right. -

Reverts of good edits: - Antandrus has been vindalizing crosswikis & other webpages on the internet, not to mention putting his link on other pages just so he can promote his (like controler site, that has now been closed for good, good news) lowly websites.

http://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=...2&oldid=1100001
in this edit, it's clear mr antandrus has no knowledge of world

history, according to him churchill never participated in any wars, instead of correcting spellin, he reverted, later he did it BUT with bowed head, only after he was reported to administrator for revert violations.

antandrus, the racist:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ant...ico_Croatian.3F

- it's clear hates croats, does not treat them right as all human races ought to be. We are all one people, nobody, including nations are above another, created equal in the eyes of the Creator with right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.

Antandrus has been suspended multiple times on other crosswikis,

banned globally:

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C...tions/antandrus
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Cont...tions/Antandrus
Now, im sure he & those who suppor thim will say accounts created

for purpose of vandalism only but that is not true, it's clear that is antandrus, you can check pattern of his reverts, very rarely he'll say why he reverts, which is another violation of wikipedia policites. many of the above edits are constructive and many are not, so if this was just vandal, he'd simply revert everything & call things stupid, just to get laugh, there is no trollin activity, besides accounts were opened for very long time, usually vandal gets blocked within an hour, again that's clear evidence it was antandrus who was blocked for vandalism.

Over the years we have not seen any justice on wikipedia when it

comes to reporting administrators, one protects another & that's also violation, I doubt anybody will listen to me here but Im writing this for posterity that's the main reason. It would be best to block antandrus forever, that's wishful thinking, as im sure he'll find tons of excuses. Even founders like jimbo told him to stop it but he convinced him he's not doing anything wrong, so jimbo allowed him (another violation, proof was not looked at, pre/determinism is bad) to continue with his reverts, name calling and so on, the list has no end. -

Additional administratorship violations: - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=341598302 READ WELL WHAT WAS REPORTED LAST YEAR. This goes hand in hand. - Antandrus reverted this many times, reason? of course easy one, he simply said done by banned user, but he never mentioned the - fact that other administrators replied to it, accepted it, archived it. Nobody touched it. - Because it was complaint about him, TRUTH WAS WRITTEN & ANTANDRUS DOES NOT LIKE ANY TRUTH ON HIM! Imagine goin to court, judge immediately rules in favor of person he knows - just because it has nice eyes, NOT EVEN TALIBAN DOES IT!

I CAN GO ON FOREVER WITH MANY OTHER COMPLAINTS AGAINST THIS EVIL

INDIVIDUAL, KIND - OD ADMINISTRATIVE VANDALS, but what's the point, you guys will protect your own, - I've never seen impartial decision on wikipedia, there was never justice. - But at least, you are to remember what antandrus did, he is not to prosper or get - any new position on any wikia sites. He is evil man, who calls people by their names, - instead of by their account name.

Even kindergarten kid knows march 5 is when dictator joseph stalin died,

- yet antandrus reverted it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=281530015 - later another user reverted it back but still it was reverted because administrators - are always "right" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=281548370, - this is sad case of lack of impartiality on wikipedia. Even when things are 100% - correct antandrus will revert without explaing why, well ladies & gentleman, here you have ode to uncaring vandal administrator with no regards, no respect for - people's efforts, good work!!!

Some time ago administrator left this note

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340190258, yet antandrus reverted other administrator's instructions as well, no regards for nothing & anythin!

Only recently on other wiki he kept on calling people by their names, never adheres to http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policy to him its all joke but if u delete this post

surely it will exist forever & then some, if you delete it, means you dont know, dont want to approach justice, because there is zero here, but assuming somebody was to violate your policy, you'd all scream how could they do such thing, we never do it!!!

Thus, this makes you pure hypocrites! You will not defand innocent, but when its your skin on the line, then it's big problem, so be neutral look into this as you swore to do your job, do it good once! It will be tough for you

dealin with justice!: Blockin this page so only reginstered users is not right, newyorkbrad above says its because of vandalism, yet that's still against policites to keep it locked for so long, no excuse, u always have too many but nobody outside wikipedia buys it, u r aware no university allows wikipedia at their campuses!? justly so! Antandrus should not be administrator, editor, nothin!The law of physics & nature is right, within gravitational field: what goes up will come down, HARD WITH BANG SOONER OR LATER dont think time will fix it, u r still dreamin!!! My words are all justified, always will be! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Privacyproblemsbydavidtroll (talk • contribs) 21:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.

Antandrus (T-C-L-K-R-D) is definitely a Wikiholic (self-admitted)...but he's generally reasonable, as far as a completely indoctrinated cult member can be. I completely believe that he has a PhD in Musical composition, given the musicological thought presented in his classical music articles...and completely understand why he decided to get out of that field to make some real money...So, definitely not "EssJay" Material at all.

It would seem, however, that this angry person probably doesn't speak English as a first language and also probably doesn't think outside of "black/white" shadings...

...Oh well, we'll find out more soon enough....

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.

Another day in the wiki-ocean of shit.

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.

Gogi is better known as "George Reeves Person" or "Squidward vandal". At the end of 2005 he was using the accounts User:Vesa and User:Projects. He came back later as User:Boxingwear. He's someone posting from Chicago and has hated Antandrus for years, he used to maintain an attack website about him.

I don't think he has anything in particular against Antandrus besides the fact that he enjoys insulting him, he just has anger management issues.

He used open proxies and infected zombie computers in early 2006 to launch a massive attack to spam images of Squidward, a character from the Spongebob cartoon, on multiple pages at once.

I don't think PIO even knows Antandrus, he's just a banned guy who is hot-headed and doesn't like editors like DIREKTOR.

Do you suppose Britannica ever has conversations like this?

Do you suppose Britannica ever has conversations like this?

Obviously not! They don't have trouble makers, and therefore pages which document their behavior are not needed.

I'd have thought you of all people would feel some kind of bond with this guy.

Kinda similar to how serial killers never work in pairs, neither do wiki-obsessives. Too much unstable ego for one room to hold.

The only difference is that they operate a strict version of flagged revisions so the "poop" vandalism never makes it to the live site.

You know, that would make a great book, I'm just sure someone has already thought of it

Kinda similar to how serial killers never work in pairs …

You know that Britannica is no longer the sombre stack of dull volumes sold by salesmen with a strange resemblance to Mormon missionaries, but a knock-off of Wikipedia complete with "anyone can edit", right? The only difference is that they operate a strict version of flagged revisions so the "poop" vandalism never makes it to the live site.

He came back later as User:Boxingwear.

I don't think PIO even knows Antandrus, he's just a banned guy who is hot-headed and doesn't like editors like DIREKTOR.

Privacyproblemsbydavidtroll

VoC, I think you've met your match.

Dammit, I hate it when people do that...

Someone could write a screenplay about two serial killers who work together. Quentin Tarantino, maybe. Who knows, maybe one of WR's regulars could produce it? Oh, wait…

Britannica doesn't have conversations. They have deadlines and don't even really bother to look at what is submitted. That is why the fact checking done a while back between EB and Wikipedia found that Wikipedia was more up to date and accurate than Britannica was.

VoC, I think you've met your match.

What? Clone VoC or do so on a non WR setting?

Ok, this guy is good. But VoC has had is easy. Anyone else close to as constantly pissed off has been absented from this site for a long time. It won't be easy but VoC could train. Roadwork. Drills. Weights. It can be done. VoC has the heart.

You're not referring to the discredited Nature study, are you?

I've seen research that approved and disapproved of the study.

Could you refer me to some of the former?

And it's news to me that my agenda involves making Wikipedia look bad, though I can imagine that some would see that as an explanation of my performance on ArbCom.

I'd have to email some people.

Well, no hurry. My likely reaction is to skim it, pause for a couple of seconds, and conclude wit ha hearty "huh".

Yeah, well, the Quentin Tarantino "version" (Pulp Fiction)

Max and Al are back in the film noir The Killers (1946) where Burt Lancaster plays the Swede in his very first film role (the Swede actually never appears in Hemingway's story). Ava Gardner's also in this one!

¤ cough ¤ splutter ¤ fume ¤
Jon

¤ cough ¤ splutter ¤ fume ¤

Jon

This one is pretty good —

Mathematical Society of Japan, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, 2nd edition, 2 vols., Kiyosi Itô (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.

Wikipedia's massive pile of name-droppings looks impressive only if you don't look closer.

If you stick within the bounds of what an encyclopedia should be — and not the inflated pretenses of new horizons for learning that lured my younger, naiver self into its deep, dim wikipits — then it's far more important to convey the essentials than to pump up the ego with a lot of concepts that remain but conceits.

But it's pumped up ignorance that Wikipedia excels at.

Jon Awbrey

From what I can see, beta.Wikiversity is putting up some rather interesting stuff related to mathematics.

The guy posting it is the "Antandrusis___" name creator. He was posting on meta but that was stopped quickly.



Actually, I used my access and logged into the music database he's been using. Many of his pages contain at least a few phrases with 4-8 words in a row lifted with no changes. I went straight down his article list and hit approximately an 80% rate of this happening down to the 35th page. I got tired after that point.

I investigated after someone else on WR mentioned that he lifts his material from that encyclopedia. Its not hard to make content when you take it right from an oxford encyclopedia.