QUOTE
“Wikipedia is fundamentally a charitable endeavor to create and distribute a quality free encyclopedia to every single person on the planet. And within our community there’s a very strong spirit that we should be concerned about quality, that we’re trying to conserve a culture that has a positive, helpful role for people and learning. It’s a fairly defined project as far as public interest,†he said in a May 2009 online interview with the Paley Center for Media.
He is insane ... of course, he gets paid exceeding well paid to be insane so I suppose there is no incentive to stick to reality and, like any other cult leader, he has to recruit more young people to sustain his position power and income.
Or is he taking about some other Wikipedia? It is not the one I know.
Targeting students is common amongst cults ... young people, away from home for the first time, no longer under their parents' influence and judgement, lots of time of their hands. Cults are an escape from social pressures vulnerable individuals cannot deal with.
Letters to the Dean time? It might spice up the conversation.
Make the debate more interesting.
I am not anti-Wikipedia. I just think that it has some problems and is impacting upon the rest of society negatively. Especially all that hardcore amateur pornography.