This has possibly interesting repercussions for Wikipedia. Certainly no one would argue that Section 230 protection applies outside the US, while I suppose it might be argued that the Wikimedia Foundation, etc, is effectively judgment-proof outside the US by reason of having no assets there. Hard to say.


QUOTE
Google fined for defamatory message on networking site
April 26, 2010

Google has been fined $US8500 ($9100) in Brazil after an anonymous internet user posted defamatory messages on one of its sites against a priest, calling him a "paedophile", media reported on Sunday.

A court in the state of Minas Gerais ruled in favor of the 54-year-old priest, identified by his initials J.R., after rejecting Google's argument that the US web giant was not responsible for what users posted on its Orkut social networking site.

The verdict upheld a lower court's judgment made after the priest sued for defamation in 2008 over the post, which called him "the paedophile ... the thief who has a lover", the O Globo daily reported.

"By making space available on virtual networking sites, in which users can post any type of message without any checks beforehand, with offensive and injurious content, and, in many cases, of unknown origin, [Google] assumes the risk of causing damage [to other people]," judge Alvimar de Avila said.

Google's Orkut is a hugely popular networking site in Brazil, although a Portuguese-language version of Facebook is now making serious inroads into its dominance.