This is the Web of Trust (WOT) entry on Wikipedia. (WOT is a free site that lets users comment on the trustworthiness of a particular website, such as whether the site is spyware free, etc).
Users can leave comments in the bottom section and vote comments up or down. If a comment gets more "down" votes than "up" votes, it will be hidden. And apparently all critical (red) comments about Wikipedia have been voted down (and censored) by Wikipedia users, even though they're perfectly fair opinions of the site. This means they will only show up on the last page, and won't appear in the comments overview chart at all.
Here's a few examples:
--
"Adult content is excessible on wikipedia."
"too much bad information, inappropriate references"
"Biased and moderated heavily by the uneducated.
Can also be re-edited quickly with false information"
"Wikipedia is not censored so if a child types blowjob on wiki, he'll probably see some explicit pictures."
"not a viable source for information, says it in the disclaimer "WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY"
---
The above have all been censored just for being critical of the site. These on the other hand have been voted to the top:
---
"Very accurate source, updated instantly. Vandalism is rare and swiftly deleted."
"Accurate,useful,and dependable information...best place to find information you are looking for"
"Cool site, for the people who actually Post FACTS! I havent seen any pop-ups of the sort from that site."
Safe to use by children because also "adult" articles are written from a neutral and informative point of view. No objectionable graphics located on their servers, links are mostly child friendly as well
---
Wow, so these guys claim to be about sharing free speech with the world, but they're so afraid of any off-site criticism, (or even just comments that the site contains adult content - which it does) that they feel the need to censor it. This is pretty sad.
