+
== Why Wikipedia is run by hypocrites... ==
+
+
This site blacklists names, censors them in fact. Any of course any that are detrimental or rude about the flagrant hypocrisy shown by this site.
+
+
Yet when it comes to censorship of unpleasantness like for example a guy sucking off his own cock at Autofellatio. All we have are reams and reams of archived discussion talking about how this site is against any form of censorship and how there must be a picture. Why?? Are people too unimaginative that they can't reconstruct in their minds a weirdo choking on his own schlong from what is being described in the texts?
+
+
Yardy yardy yardy....yet Wikipedia takes a very strong when it comes to user names especially those that mock this great edifice to generalised learning. That makes this site's "Keepers of the Seal" some of the biggest hypocrites ever.
+
+
So much for selfless self interest more like the worst kind of selfish self interest....I mean who decided a blocked name. You me everybody?? No just a small group of "select" admins who decide everything on this site.
+
+
Terrible, truly terrible....

Yet when it comes to censorship of unpleasantness like for example a guy sucking off his own cock at Autofellatio. All we have are reams and reams of archived discussion talking about how this site is against any form of censorship and how there must be a picture. Why?? Are people too unimaginative that they can't reconstruct in their minds a weirdo choking on his own schlong from what is being described in the texts?

Username entered already in use. Please choose a different name

02:45, 2 April 2006 Sandahl (talk | contribs) blocked Autofellatio (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (username)

Good points. (BTW, the admin is Soap (T-C-L-K-R-D) , not Song. Whoopie. As if it mattered, actually.)

Of course, the bulk of possible names blocked by this blacklist, especially the "Attack Titles" part,
were a direct result of Grawp's activities. He casts a mighty shadow.

Any bets on how long that complaint will remain on the blacklist talkpage?
I'll say, 24 hours.

Hypocrisy on WP? That's news?

Is there a User:Autofellatio? If not, can someone set up the account, please? And put the picture from the article on the user page? If it gets blocked (and I'd bet money it would be), that would demonstrate their hypocrisy.

You don't need user:Autofellatio. They already blocked user:nipple37 on the basis that their username was inflammatory and distracting. You can't get a better example than that.

Here's an even better one - User:Poop19. He was indef blocked as a vandal (meaning his IP was blocked from even creating a new username) because he had "poop" in his username. OMG!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...h=-1&tagfilter=

So Wikipedia has no problem with loads of porn, violent images, and pedophiliac content - but if someone dare create an account with words like "poop" or "nipple" in their screenname, they'll get indef blocked as a vandal for choosing a "blatantly offensive username".

I just don't get Wikipedia (and I'm not sure I want to).

Right, agree that WP has much worse problems. It still occurs to me to ask "what kind of person would choose 'Poop19' for an account name"?

Probably one of the 'Youtube Poop' enthusiasts who labored to create an article on their passion.

How about this one then - User:Buggerit. For our American friends a "bugger" is a person who sticks his dick up someone's arse (ass) - or maybe bugger is OK in AmE ?

You could try some breaching experiments with fudgepacker and poopdeck

Fudgepacker? No, no no ... I can guess.

We really must put together a BrE/AmE and vice versa listing of all these useful terms.

Rear gunner? Is that OK in AmE?



.........Stone me! Just tried to create RearGunner.. and it's already there, not blocked

I'm now back over there to try ManWithABigDick. Wonder how long that will last?

Mods,
Could this thread maybe be moved to the tarpit?
Jon

Apparently not.

Oh joy! Now we can play "Let's Be Stupid" on WR!