Objectivity vs. SubjectivityQUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 2nd June 2010, 2:41am)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 1st June 2010, 9:28pm)
Don't tell us---tell Seth. He seems to enjoy poking the Little King-Boy, so let him bring up Section 230 on this talk page (not on Jimbo's user talkpage, where too many toads will see it and want to delete it).
I don't know ... is there any evidence to suggest that anyone individual IS ABLE to tell their own lifestory objectively?
The problem isn't so much telling it
objectively, but telling it in an entertaining manner without waxing tedious.
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 2nd June 2010, 2:41am)
Has Jimbo been on the couch?
Yes, but not
that couch. See ValleyWag for the salacious details.
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 2nd June 2010, 2:41am)
Mostly I bow to your wisdom Moulton, and recognise that you may be using this threat thread to go off at a tangent, but what evidence is there to suggest Jimbo's version of his own life is any more objective than anyone else's?
Jimbo lives in a fishbowl, kind of like
Truman Burbank, but without the self-awareness. The discrepancies between Jimbo's own version and what the Jimbo Watchers see makes for an objective study in subjectivity.
Not even Ayn Rand could tell her own story objectively.
And in any event, if a person could glean the insights buried in the tangle of their own lifestory, becoming aware of those insights would almost surely change the direction of the story.
Consider, for example, how Sam Vaknin changed, once he diagnosed and acknowledged his own narcisism.