Jon
![dry.gif](http://wikipediareview.com/smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif)
to subject users other to relentless scrutiny - check
to criticize its leaders and supporters and activities - check
to monitor, speculate, worry, and poke and prod each other - check (and is that some reference to Amsterdam?)
and, especially, to do any of the above in public - check
flame warring on blogs
respond to PR shot in non-Wiki media
publishing firey critiques
phoning, letter writing and email campaigning funders and other concerned entities
Never mind keep up a constant level of guerilla war on the site itself etc etc etc
• There are numerous references on her website of suicidal contributors, contributors having issues with their medication, or even non-prescription drugs.
• There is considerable evidence of her unpaid workers doing extensive shifts well beyond any reasonable health and safety or union agreed limitations.
• There is inarguable evidence that these unpaid worker are minors, child laborers.
• Has her foundation ever done any survey about the extent and effects of mental illnesses amongst its volunteers, including the costs to individuals and others?
• Has it ever consider whether its effect is good for and healthy for those individuals?
• Does it consider itself entirely without any responsibility towards the well being of its unpaid workers, e.g. allow individuals to do continuous 18 or 24 hour shift, 7 day weeks?
• Has it ever reviewed the longer term effects on young individuals?