QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sat 15th January 2011, 5:58pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
.....went to the business section, and there was a
huge photo of Sue.
Standard-issue, poorly cooked, half-heartedly researched WP "journalism".
Now they're quoting Joe Reagle as an "expert".
As usual, the
comments are most entertaining......
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winnaaaaar!
QUOTE
galactus93, 12:39 PM on January 15, 2011
If you've ever taken the time to peek behind the curtain at the inner workings of Wikipedia's "administrators" (Read: cabal of basement-dwelling, fursuit-wearing, self-diagnosed Asperger's cases) you'll learn pretty quickly that it's really nothing more than a huge text-based MUD masquerading as an encyclopedia. Good for a laugh (on a good day), not much more.
QUOTE(Larry Sanger @ Sat 15th January 2011, 10:39pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Journalism is dying. Oddly, it isn't the competition from free stuff online that is killing it, it is the bizarre laziness and low standards of journalists. Well, either I've gotten more critical or it has gotten noticeably worse in the last ten years.
I agree, except that I consider journalism in the MSM to have been dead since at least 1994. If you will recall, that was the year of A Tale of Two Skaters, followed hard upon by l'affaire OJ. I cannot recall another time when journalistic laziness and obsession with celebrity was on more blatant or disgusting display. To the extent that anything has changed since, it has only gotten worse.