Welcome to my page with the most sincere love pictures you will find on this wiki. If love disturbs you, don't look at them---better commit yourself to a psycho hospital. You can also add your own love pictures if you like, but as I've created this page for my own research purposes, take note: I don't like men's love, only women's love and mixed love. To be honest, I think men's love is against God's will. So is women's love, but at least women's love makes me feel funny in my pants, and not upchuck in horror. (Note how carefully I've avoided the P-word, so as not to wake up Internet filters).

The 18 year old Nmatavka is doing a fine job curating a museum of wikipr0N.



The page was nominated for speedy deletion. The nomination was speedily declined by the 20 year old Explicit because it's a gallery of freely licensed images.

So is women's love, but at least women's love makes me feel funny in my pants, and not upchuck in horror.

Delicious carbuncle
February 22, 2011 at 9:37 AM

Regarding your point 6, whether or not individual female editors are offended by pornography, I’m sure there are many who question why there is so much gratuitous use of pornographic images in WMF projects.

When a Wikipedia admin denies a request to delete a gallery of nearly 700 images (which include images of the insertion of anal beads, “Simulated Forced Fellatio in Bondage”, and topless adolescent girls) because “it’s a gallery of freely licensed images”, what message does that send?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nmatavka/N0rp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nmatavka/N0rpI expected that it would be deleted soon after by Gardner or some passing admin, but it has remained, racking up an average 1500 hits a day. Perhaps I should have mentioned that it includes one of the images that Larry Sanger reported to the FBI?

It appears someone else has finally noticed this page and nominated it for deletion. Among those suggesting it be deleted: Zetawoof, WP admin and zoophile, citing the WP guidelines about userpages and not using images that "would bring the project into disrepute". You can't make this stuff up.

Many of the images are ancient illustrations and artworks of sex. Not sure why that turn's him on, but whatevs.



All the gay men out there are upchucking at his idiocy. Does he try to be funny, or is his English just crappy?