QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 30th March 2011, 3:45pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
I just
cannot understand why people, especially journalists, are so utterly brainless when it comes to this issue.
Of course “academics†aren't going to contribute to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is trying to put them out of business, ruin their livelihoods, and take food off their tables! Giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war is
treason, people —
figure it out!
I can understand why the WMF and its contractors would include such moronic questions in press releases, but the only reason I can think of for why journalists simply parrot these things in respectable news outlets is because the journalists themselves have been compromised, if not completely corrupted, by the nature of their own personal online activities.
I should have thought that some of the older timers hereabouts would have figured out by now what a bunch of hooey all this guff about the Nøø Media actually is, but nooooo …
The Corporate Owned Media that e-ploys this “new and improved†breed of
journalistes sans intégrité are nothing more or less than the shabbiest segments of the Old Media turned loose from all the controls that formerly held them at bay.
And the Corporate Owned Media recognize a kindred spirit in Wikimpedia when they see one — they are far too old to be fooled by the moronic hype that sucks the marks into playing the Wikimpediot game.
That is why they see it as such a humongous resource of dumb cluck workers, and why they keep trying to draw the dumber acadumb-asses into their carny tent.
Jon