QUOTE(carbuncle @ Sat 9th April 2011, 6:35am)
Are you upset that they didn't mention you by name?
But he's right, you know. This sort of thing does show, quite conclusively, that the WMF board is completely out of touch with reality.
Then again, it's an organization that operates at cross-purposes with itself, and it has been for some time. It should be noted that the last bit about "repelling trolls and stalkers" actually begins with the words, "Working with colleagues to develop practices to discourage disruptive and hostile behavior." Clearly this is completely illogical - the only way to do that is to get rid of those "colleagues" entirely.
Attracting and retaining "editors" is only the WMF's goal because it has to justify continued funding. As we've noted already, they're thinking like a corporation - everything is based on "grow or die," when in fact there's little need for growth, and they should really consolidate their properties as much as possible and focus on quality control, since that's what the
readers want. "Attract and retain" is also at odds with the natural, inherent tendencies of the WP user community - but presumably they know that, or they wouldn't be making these kinds of statements.
If they really want to attract and retain users, as opposed to consolidate and improve content, one simple thing they could do might be to figure out a way to red-link stub articles. In other words, they wouldn't have to actually delete the stubs (though that would be just as good, if not better), they would just have to change the link color. That would cause an increase in stub-expansion activity that could go on for a year - possibly two years, or even longer. And it's unlikely that anyone would seriously object to it. (Would they?)
Another simple thing would be to stop using the words "trolls" and "stalkers" completely, since they don't know what they mean, and regardless, each Wikipedian understands implicitly that it's just a matter of time before those words are used to refer to him.