User Damiens.rf (T-C-L-K-R-D) goes on a Mass Playboy deletion binge of 100 + topics and has Garrett Fitzgerald, official of The International Order of the Rainbow for Girls, Patron of various women's Freemasonic Chapters, and the WikiProject Pornography defence crew (link to list) coming instantly to their rescue ... tissues available at the entrance kiosk on your way in.

See: April 29.

Something about whether having had their centerfold on public display makes a girl notable or not.

Is this a cryptic threat from Garrett?

Disgustingly, the topics do not even all have pictures of the notable "sex-positive" model feminists but a few have the usually tawdry asides ...


... We take it she means "leg openly" as the Jews in pornography tend to be disproportionately male. And, no, by "disproportionately male" I do not mean well hung.

I'll avoid any pictorial link for the difficulty of finding any with their faces includes.

Pass me the vomit bucket.

Wrong on both counts, but thanks for playing.

Are you being pedantic about something?

A lot has happened since 2003 but Garrett still plays the funny hand shakes game and takes a moral interest in young Rainbow girls as well as defending the Wikipedia from mass deletion of Playboy bunnies ... no more a reliable source than himself.



And you have no idea how much effort it takes to find a "modest" shot of a playboy centerfold.

I just read Wikipedia Review for the articles.

Are those the virgins that Masons sacrifice to gain supernatural powers?

I'd say the blonde on the back row will receive plenty of invitations to rise up the ranks of the Order of the Golden Rod. Playboy, on the other hand, make girls notable by displaying their centerfolds. Now, what was Garrett saying about not being a patron or officer?

I am remember the vampire sex fantasy thread of not so long ago ... but given how they turn out after 50 years, I cannot say freemasonry really does that much for them (... especially if it really is Satan worship!).

Playboy captures them modestly and immodestly at their best.

Perhaps they were a Patron, but are not now.

Oh, come on, we know they are still involved in Freemasonry and its enculting of young women via the Rainbow order.

I am not going to go stalking for "reliable sources" on a throwaway gag.

We have established he's a lousy webmaster.