...would seem to require the WMF staff to enforce 18 U.S.C. 1466A. This is very interesting in light of my reporting of the WMF to the FBI, which was about a year ago.
http://larrysanger.org/2011/05/wikipedias-...legal-policies/
The WMF counsel's announcement on Foundation-L had no substantive responses.
Full Version: Wikipedia's proposed legal policies
QUOTE(Larry Sanger @ Sun 22nd May 2011, 3:46pm) 
...would seem to require the WMF staff to enforce 18 U.S.C. 1466A. This is very interesting in light of my reporting of the WMF to the FBI, which was about a year ago.
http://larrysanger.org/2011/05/wikipedias-...legal-policies/
The WMF counsel's announcement on Foundation-L had no substantive responses.
QUOTE
An editor has been working on the biography of a living politician. That politician believes that the article constitutes defamation and sues the editor. The Wikimedia Foundation will likely not finance a defense to the defamation claim. There may be local lawyers who are willing to help at a reduced or no cost, but the editor will be responsible for finding counsel.
I know a certain editor, Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D) who loves to defame people on wikipedia who said editor don't like.
I can provide, via email full details of said editor to any aggrieved party of said editor so as the aggrieved party can get good service and said editor.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.