QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Fri 21st October 2011, 5:46pm)
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Fri 21st October 2011, 6:36pm)
Well as the pictures on the website are somewhat milder than the most extreme things you would see on Wikipedia, I suppose that's not a problem, Peter said ironically.
Well, yes, right, but the user pages and the articles pages are different. According to WP:UPNO "Generally, you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal website. Your user page is about you as a Wikipedian, and pages in your user space should be used as part of your efforts to contribute to the project". Of course he provided only the link to his web page, but still...
He claims to have written Evolution. This article is read by kids. What, if an innocent kid would hit the link at the author of the article's user page in the hope to learn something more about the evolution and ...
I believe that user pages should be free from any of this.
For example this discussion about Lesbian sexual practicesQUOTE
Fingering can be penetrative, and oral sex can as well, when either fingers or the tongue enter the vagina. The Non-penetrative sex article makes this clear
should not have taken place at admin's talk page that is visited by kids.
Or let's take for example
that porno-loving administrator Malik Shabazz (see user boxes). I of course have absolutely nothing against Malik enjoying porno, I even believe that, if Malik were spending more time enjoining porno than he is spending editing wikipedia, wikipedia would have been a much better place
, but come on who needs to know what Malik likes to do, when he's not editing wikipedia? What his enjoyment of porno has to do with his activities on wikipedia?