QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 22nd November 2011, 3:36am)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adm..._of_stuff_ok.3FApparently just the mere
mention of Wikipedia Review sets off the klaxons.
The problem is that some users like to blame blocked or banned editors for every disruption on wikipedia. It is so easy and so convenient because a blocked user cannot respond.
A few weeks ago tarc
alleged I was using proxies to add some kind of racist images to malik's talk Apparently the image added to Malik's talk was "a rope used to hang nineteenth-century Englishmen " as it is stated in the AN/I thread.
tarc stated that it was
QUOTE
Typical {{u|mbz1}} tactic.
I do not watch an/i , but somebody emailed me the link to this lie. It really made me sick to my stomach. How somebody could claim that it is "typical mbz1 tactic"? Have I ever done anything
even remotely close to this?
tarc, now between the two of us could you please tell me why did you do it?
If you believed I could have done something like this, it means you are an absolute idiot.
If you did not believe I could have done something like this, but claimed I did, this means you are an absolute scoundrel.
So the choice is yours: Are you an absolute idiot or an absolute scoundrel, user tarc?
Or maybe you want to tell me that you are sorry for your AN/I post?