Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: PC2012/RfC 1
> Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
Michaeldsuarez
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PC2012/RfC_1

The latest Pending Changes RfC has began.
Ottava
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Tue 4th September 2012, 1:01pm) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PC2012/RfC_1

The latest Pending Changes RfC has began.



I never thought Pending Changes will fix anything. It just gives more power to a select few without any real need.

If they wanted real reforms, they would focus solely on sourcing - no more sources less than a month old, only legitimate academic works, etc. That would get rid a lot of the crap and make it a real encyclopedia. Instead, Pending Changes wont really do anything but give a new award. Where is Malleus when we need him?
Michaeldsuarez
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=512460182

The discussion had been closed. The result was "no consensus".
Ottava
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Sat 15th September 2012, 4:25pm) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=512460182

The discussion had been closed. The result was "no consensus".


Haven't you figured it out? Consensus is meaningless. It is easy to game. When there is clear 2/3s for something, they will declare no consensus while claiming one when there is barely 50%. Democracy is just a front to try to legitimize their own bad actions.
Retrospect
QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 4th September 2012, 6:44pm) *

no more sources less than a month old

Bloody silly idea. What's wrong with the latest issue of the British Medical Journal, ,say?

Oh, I forgot, the British Medical Association don't do their own printing so they're crap!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.