'We aren't democratic. Our readers edit the entries, but we're actually quite snobby.

View the article

now, how come our feeds picked this up from Newsvine but not New York Times? I am pretty sure New York Times is picked up by RSS feeds o_O

It was picked up, but that phrase wasn't highlighted.

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=14002&hl=

ah ha

The snobbiness comes across as "erratic and arrogant."

The repudiation of the democratic model begs the question of what group decision-making model is at work in WP.

It appears to be an erratic and arrogant oligarchy.

Other, more pithy names for it might be:

Dysfunctiony

Dramocracy

Tragedy

And the all-time fave-rites —

Hypocracy (pronounced "hype-ocracy" in the UK and some parts of Canada).

Mediocracy (rule by the most mediocre medium).

Jonny

Suggest replacing the bb with tt