QUOTE(Amarkov @ Fri 7th March 2008, 3:19am)
In Reader's Digest, there's this article on a project to collect six-word autobiographies. It gave a few examples, and lucky for funniness, Jimmy Wales was given as one.
Now, I could see if it said "Yes, you can edit this article". At least then it is a clearly accurate summary of what he's done. But this implies that he finds Wikipedian treatment of biographies to be the most important accomplishment of his life.
For his sake, I hope it isn't.
For our sake, I hope he figures this out. I have a very self-recursive fantasy of Jimbo Wales' tombstone in a cemetary, with dates, and
"Yes, you can edit this article" as an epitaph. And in front of the grave marker, a marble recepticle of chisels and hammers available for the use of anybody from the visiting public with a momentary interest in the alteration of lapidary inscription.
If all of this isn't enough to teach a lesson, there will be some deep, deep cognitive dissonance. For not only is BLP policy one of the cankers in the bloom of Wikipedia, it's also the mechanism for the founder's worst personal nightmares. I mean, you've heard of people having their dirty laundry opened to the public, but this is one of the few men of our times it has
literally happened to. AND because he was trying to
circumvent the automated dirty laundry generating system he himself had set up, for the sake of somebody he was going to have sex with. AND that this episode is duly going to be inserted into HIS biography. Via his own rules. With not enough people available to bribe or hump to stop it from happening, eventually. The levels of recursive justice here boggle the mind. I'm beginning to wonder if there isn't actually a God.
There's certainly karma.
-Milton