QUOTE(Kato @ Sat 19th April 2008, 5:37pm)
This is when things get really silly..
QUOTE(Slashdot)
"An anonymous user added information about to Wikipedia's entry on Sacha Baron Cohen three days before the now-referenced external article was written. The Independent wrote the referenced article apparently using Wikipedia as the source establishing his 'Goldman Sachs' career. Now Wikipedia uses as a references the article that came after the initial modification to Wikipedia itself."
In discussions on reliable sources, this a point I have made, that we know that the press use Wikipedia, so they have to be treated with care. Again and again, Wikipediots need to recognise that you cannot invent some simple test to see if a source is sound. You need to do research and fact checking - things that are suggested to be evil in WackiWikiWorld.
I move more to a position that the NOR policy creates more problems than it solves. On the surface it seems sane, but it stops people thinking. "It's got a cite? It's a wrap."