QUOTE(Kato @ Sat 21st February 2009, 8:25pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Last week in the Guardian, a journalist tore
WR member and WP critic Andrew Orlowski a new arse in an Op-Ed. The journo trashed Orlowski's paper the Register as well. Ostensibly because Orlowski criticises "Twitter".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/...-charity-trollsI don't know anything about "Twitter" but it sounds odious.
Hah. You're right. Twitter attracts the Paleolithic "webizen" in much the same way that
Boing Boing or Metafilter does. It's a shiny happy place, where bad things don't happen,
and it has all the Web 2.0 hype on earth behind it.
Sorta like Peter Pan's Neverland, with routers.
And if you think Paul Carr's attack on Orlowski was sad, read some of
Carr's other columns.
For example.
Strange that a whiny little snark would be attacking another snark,
for
daring to criticize Twitter. Or perhaps, par for the course in what we
laughingly call "the News Media". In a deep portentious voice, natch.