QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Mon 4th May 2009, 8:22am)
QUOTE(LaraLove @ Mon 4th May 2009, 12:13pm)
I doubt he's been quoted out of context, but then I agree with what he's quoted as saying, so...
Well, that's
one position that one can have...but should the "founder" of Wikipedia be calling people names in public and making judgments about their intentions, without having had any communication with them?
In my experience, when Jimmy Wales gives praise to one of his "trusted" admins (and the
secret private mailing lists they maintain), or says he's "cranking away" on a project, or says he doesn't "really have a problem with" something... it's soon found that whatever or whomever he's lauded has self-destructed in a whimper of fail.
Conversely, when he calls a freelance journalist "an idiot", or rages on about things being "antithetical" to Wikipedia, or decrees that "some people need to find a different hobby"... it eventually is shown that those people are more stable, intelligent, and long-lasting than Wales himself could have ever imagined.
Regardless of how you view what the Wikipedia Art guys were doing, or why, to have Jimbo's pronouncement that they are "vandals" and "trolls" can only lend credit to whatever it was they were doing.
Greg