Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Biggest Cabal
> Wikimedia Discussion > General Discussion
Grep
A new and interesting theory has come to light. It has been suspected by many for some time that (1) Wikipedia is controlled by a cabal (2) Wikipedia's primary purpose is as a MMORPG. In an astonishing display of audacity, the true explanation can be found on Wikipedia itself: The Babylonian Brotherhood. These are reptilian humanoids from the planet Alpha Draco who maintain their control through the generation of fear and negative emotion, which is food to these entities, by manufacturing conflicts.

Suddenly it all makes sense.
Moulton
QUOTE(Grep @ Tue 28th July 2009, 5:15am) *
Suddenly it all makes sense.

Facebook has the same game, but they call it Mafia Wars.
A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Grep @ Tue 28th July 2009, 5:15am) *

A new and interesting theory has come to light. It has been suspected by many for some time that (1) Wikipedia is controlled by a cabal...


If this is what control is all about, I would hate to see the Wikipedia version of anarchy! yecch.gif
Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Grep @ Tue 28th July 2009, 2:15am) *

Suddenly it all makes sense.
The revelation that Kris Kristofferson is a reptilian humanoid does explain a lot.


QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 28th July 2009, 5:56am) *

If this is what control is all about, I would hate to see the Wikipedia version of anarchy! yecch.gif
Anarchy and oligarchy are closely related, as Plato noted. As the methodology of empires evolved over time, oligarchs developed techniques for "controlled anarchy," as they learned that mobs can be manipulated and the outcome of anarchistic impulses "shaped."
GlassBeadGame
I am surprised that some kind of quasi-mystical Wikipedian with claims of special access to a "deeper truth" has not swept through the site. Wikipedia certainly is a cult, but it lacks any leader capable of maintaining any unified center as the "God-king" fails. Certainly the project is plagued by endless pretenders to such leadership from the demagogue Everyking to the smug self superior Giano with just about everything imaginable in between. Everything except some wiki-messiah that is. Claim special knowledge and revealed truth. Use special magic glasses or an angelic decoder ring to show true meaning in the Pillars or other founding documents. Provide a spiritual motive force behind "information wants to be free" and the cosmic mind's sacred wiki messenger bringing mankind the Akashic Record. Demand ever more sacrifice in exchange to deeper and deeper levels of gnostic-wiki Revelation. The possibilities for mischief are endless.
Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 28th July 2009, 10:49am) *

QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 28th July 2009, 5:56am) *

If this is what control is all about, I would hate to see the Wikipedia version of anarchy! yecch.gif


Anarchy and oligarchy are closely related, as Plato noted. As the methodology of empires evolved over time, oligarchs developed techniques for "controlled anarchy," as they learned that mobs can be manipulated and the outcome of anarchistic impulses "shaped."


Mobs supply the recurrent injections of vapid chaos that drive the infernal combustion engines of autocracy — the only variable that ch-ch-changes is How Many RPMs?

Your Mileage Ain't Likely To Vary A Whole Lot (YMALTVAWL) …

Jon Awbrey
Milton Roe
QUOTE(Grep @ Tue 28th July 2009, 2:15am) *

A new and interesting theory has come to light. It has been suspected by many for some time that (1) Wikipedia is controlled by a cabal (2) Wikipedia's primary purpose is as a MMORPG. In an astonishing display of audacity, the true explanation can be found on Wikipedia itself: The Babylonian Brotherhood. These are reptilian humanoids from the planet Alpha Draco who maintain their control through the generation of fear and negative emotion, which is food to these entities, by manufacturing conflicts.

Suddenly it all makes sense.

It's an old suggestion:

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=102372

QUOTE(Milton)
Emphasis on "drama" as "trauma" (they are the same word root), meaning in this case (rather than the classic one which seeks to heal trauma by catharsis) to seek to simply create new hurt. No catharsis, since this sort of drama is too stupid and too simple to invoke catharsis, which by definition requires understanding and learning. No, this type of prodrama involves the impulse to practical jokery, but worse. It involves jerking somebody's chain for no particular reason, except to see a reaction. Trolls on the internet being good examples. We may call it pro- or protodrama, since it's only an ugly version of the very first part of classical Greek drama.

Protodrama is often mistaken for social cruelty. For good reason, since most of it is just that.

This kind of behavior is not classical but, in the modern sense, more closely related to the romantic, and hyper-romantic. It is performance "art". It does things for the "shock value". It enjoys "deconstruction." It is the Clockwork Orange where vandalism and destruction is sought as artform by people too talentless to have some type of actual creation as their artform.

A subgroup of protodrama for its own sake is expression of outrage by people left out of social networks. I just saw this this one played well by Butters Scotch as Professor Chaos, with his minion General Disarray. Those of you who don't watch Southpark should try to locate your sense of humor. Probably it's under the couch with dustballs and the last slipper you lost.

On the internet, those who can't get laid and thus spend their time indef blocking people out of frustration on Wikipedia, are called "administrators." Most of them love proto-drama, but would never admit it. However, when other people are under their thumb and making a fuss, it makes them feel alive. They can't get that feeling, out in their real lives.

On the otherside, are certain people who went to WP not to write an encyclopedia, but to create drama, as they do everywhere else in their sorry lives. It worked for awhile, but now they've been kicked out and want to continue. Ah, Encyclopedia Dramatica! Made for this purpose.

Now, the various Star Trek/ Mindworm creatures who feed on negative emotions, never quantified the chaotic and unpleasant effect they had on the world. But the interenet drama addicts actually have made an advance, and have a word for this: in internet slang, it's called "lulz." I do not know the pronunciation. Lultz, probably, as in the German or Yiddish z. Derivations are claimed by way of LOLs, but any LOLs are the kind you get from putting one of your socks over your cat's head, to see what he does, while trying frantically to get it off.


The Mindworm (1950, Cyril Kornbluth) is the prototypical SF story about a mutant human who lives on pure terror and negative emotions, generated just before he kills. He's finally killed as a vampire when he makes the mistake of going to some place inhabited by people from some ancient part of Europe where they know about such stuff.

The mindworm was ripped off in the old "Star Trek classic" series, at least twice. Once in an episde where they encounter some creature who's been doing this since it was Jack the Ripper, and once when they find themselves fighting Klingons (Michael Ansara, in fact!) under the evil direction of such a negative emotion sucker.
Kelly Martin
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 28th July 2009, 2:29pm) *
The mindworm was ripped off in the old "Star Trek classic" series, at least twice. Once in an episde where they encounter some creature who's been doing this since it was Jack the Ripper, and once when they find themselves fighting Klingons (Michael Ansara, in fact!) under the evil direction of such a negative emotion sucker.
Arguably the episode with Melvin Belli also falls within this category, although that's slightly different. It's a common enough theme in science fiction, and I doubt that Kornbluth is the only writer to come up with it independently.
Grep
Drat! Still, as Borges put it, All great writers create their precursors.
Milton Roe
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 28th July 2009, 12:48pm) *

QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 28th July 2009, 2:29pm) *
The mindworm was ripped off in the old "Star Trek classic" series, at least twice. Once in an episde where they encounter some creature who's been doing this since it was Jack the Ripper, and once when they find themselves fighting Klingons (Michael Ansara, in fact!) under the evil direction of such a negative emotion sucker.
Arguably the episode with Melvin Belli also falls within this category, although that's slightly different. It's a common enough theme in science fiction, and I doubt that Kornbluth is the only writer to come up with it independently.

Yeah, but 1950 is getting to be pretty early. Before that is the Golden Era of pulps where you have only 2 or 3 SF mags. Let's see you find something earlier.

Excellent hit on Melvin Belli as Gorgon, the Friendly Angel corrupter of children ala Lord of the Flies in what is possibly the single worst classic Star Trek episode ever (yes worse than Spock's Brain).

An Belli himself in real life fed on negative emotions that he generated. A perfect example was his defense of Jack Ruby, who certainly didn't premeditate the murder of Oswald, since he only happened to be here late, during an accidently late jail-transfer, which Ruby would have missed if it had happened on-schedule (while Ruby was wiring money to somebody, with his dog in his car). By bringing up Ruby's old mob and club associations, Belli succeeded in jerking the Ruby jury's chain so much that he got the guy who killed the guy who killed JFK, sentenced to the electric chair! In Texas, that's remarkable, as most people figured Oswald "needed killin'". They thought better of Ruby's conviction later, but only after Belli had departed. With free defense lawyers like that, you don't need prosecutors...

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.