QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Sat 29th August 2009, 10:35pm)
[/size]
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />How To: Annotate Images from [b]Wikipedia[/b]
[size="-1"]ReadWriteWeb
You may not know it, but most of the images in Wikipedia are actually hosted on its sister project, Wikimedia Commons. If you find a favorite image on the ...
<a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&ned=us&scoring=d&ncl=d4ykrzUsjtWo2LM" target="_blank"></a>View the article I think this sounds like a
really shitty idea whether you think Wikipedia's the best thing ever, the most evil defamation machine ever to pollute the internet, or anything in between. I can't think of any benefit to this, and can think of a hell of a lot of downsides, unless you have touching faith that these images will really be tagged with useful and informative captions and not assorted variations of "ugly faggot lol".