QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Tue 1st September 2009, 4:27am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
[/size]
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Doctors Group Says [b]Wikipedia Defamed It[/b]
[size="-1"]Courthouse News Service
MANHATTAN (CN) - The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine claims Wikimedia defamed it. The group, also known as A4M, says Wikipedia ...
<a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&ned=us&scoring=d&ncl=dnYDEiL7j7uYJjM" target="_blank"></a>View the article Ah, Goldman and Klatz. Though I have nothing to do with A4M, I have have had certain dealings with these two myself under other circumstances where we crossed paths. And a more perfect pair of putzes, the world has rarely seen.
Watching them waste their money trying to sue Wikipedia for defamation is like watching a scorpion in bottle fight. Except scorpions in many ways are neat animals, so I don't enjoy that last, really.