Full Version: Nick James blog: Wikipedia - Get Bracknell (blog)
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Nick James blog: [b]Wikipedia[/b]
Get Bracknell (blog)
Anyone who runs a website for business purposes knows the importance of well written, accurate content in creating the right impression of a ...
View the article
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Nick James blog: [b]Wikipedia[/b]
Wokingham Times (blog)
Anyone who runs a website for business purposes knows the importance of well written, accurate content in creating the right impression of a ...
View the article
QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Wed 16th December 2009, 10:03am) 
Yet another fine example of Channeling Jimbo Journalism …
Jon
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 16th December 2009, 11:10am)
QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Wed 16th December 2009, 10:03am)
Yet another fine example of Channeling Jimbo Journalism …
Jon
It's not even channelling Jimbo, who wouldn't be caught dead repeating this howler:
QUOTE
Yet in the first months of this year the famous online encyclopaedia has reportedly lost around 49,000 of its volunteer contributors, approximately 44,000 more than during the same period last year.
Ironically it seems to be new rules imposed to improve the accuracy of the site’s content that has caused this sudden drop in support.
Ironically it seems to be new rules imposed to improve the accuracy of the site’s content that has caused this sudden drop in support.
What new rules have been "imposed" to improve accuracy??
This guy is MONUMENTALLY clueless. Unlike Jay Walsh would knows the truth and who is paid to deflect your attention from it, this Nick James blogger guy hasn't even got to first base (in order to lie well, you have to know the real score).
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 16th December 2009, 1:27pm)
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 16th December 2009, 11:10am)
QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Wed 16th December 2009, 10:03am)
Yet another fine example of Channeling Jimbo Journalism …
Jon
It's not even channelling Jimbo, who wouldn't be caught dead repeating this howler:
QUOTE
Yet in the first months of this year the famous online encyclopaedia has reportedly lost around 49,000 of its volunteer contributors, approximately 44,000 more than during the same period last year.
Ironically it seems to be new rules imposed to improve the accuracy of the site’s content that has caused this sudden drop in support.
What new rules have been "imposed" to improve accuracy??
This guy is MONUMENTALLY clueless. Unlike Jay Walsh would knows the truth and who is paid to deflect your attention from it, this Nick James blogger guy hasn't even got to first base (in order to lie well, you have to know the real score).
That precious line has been repeatered too often on the Web 'o' Maya of late to be anything else but a Cut 'n' Paste Job out of some — Your Donation ¤€£$¥ @ Work — White (WikiWash) Paper of Talking Points from WMF Grind Controll.
Jon
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Nick James blog: [b]Wikipedia[/b]
Reading Post (blog)
Anyone who runs a website for business purposes knows the importance of well written, accurate content in creating the right impression of a ...
and more »
View the article
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.