"A devout Catholic, Mary became, in 1673, the second wife of James, Duke of York, the younger brother and heir of Charles II, who later succeeded him as King James II. - There is a pronoun/clause-agreement issue here. I read the last clause as modifying "Charles II", when that's not what is intended." -- Karanacs Conversely, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=362645299 -- Johnbod

'overlinking' -- Karanacs

'Linking is not great' -- Johnbod

'Is it important that Lord Peterborough was groom of the stole?' -- Karanacs

'explain briefly who Peterborough was...' -- Jackyd101

Need I explain any further?

[Modnote: off to the annex ...]

[Modnot: Welcome to WR!...]

"Editors contradicting each other"

In other news, sun rises in the east. Film at 11.

"my experiences at FAC recently make me think the process is no longer about improving articles but placing obstacles in the way of article writers to meet a set of arbitrary criteria that indeed defy common sense and the benchmark of brilliant writing."

Per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=371202931

"With crystal clarity, I have realized I am not interested in getting this to FA. I'm requesting it be archived, or someone else may replace me as a nominator. Note on Karanacs' page to follow."

Per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=371100753

"Pragmatically, you should archive it if no one else picks it up. I'm not terribly interested in another bronze star. ... I think I might have stuck with it to improve it, but this and the preceding FAC, which I also abandoned, has proven to be very unpleasant."

Per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=371102437