QUOTE(dtobias @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:21am)
That's kind of bogus; I checked out what Google actually returns for "wikipedia review", and while some of the things on the first page are actually about WR (the first result is WR itself, the second is the Wikipedia article on WR, and soon afterward comes the Encyclopedia Dramatica article on it), but there are also things like "The Charms of Wikipedia | The New York Review of Books", and as you get into succeeding pages, such things where "Wikipedia" and "review" just happen to occur close together without referring to this site eventually dominate.
Using quotes, which should greatly reduce this problem, "jimmy wales" gets 434,000 hits. "jimbo wales" gets 101,000 (though doubtless some duplicate "jimmy wales"). "wikipedia review" gets 24,100 and "wikipediareview" gets 14,300.