QUOTE
Wouldn’t it make far more sense to encourage students to use Wikipedia, cite it appropriately, and then insist that they also use X number of linked primary sources? How much more valuable would it be for a kid writing a report on Mars to not only read about it in relatively straightforward terms on Wikipedia and then also read a relatively obscure website put together by an MIT scientist on Martian climate issues?
I'm assuming that if these kids are writing a report on Mars, they are in the fifth grade or higher. The good old World Book Encyclopedia was already off-limits by then for us. Was that unusual, or does this guy have terrible ideas about education (or both)?