Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Getting Visibility on Wikipedia Becomes Easier - eReleases (press release)
> Media Forums > Wikipedia in the Media
Newsfeed

<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Getting Visibility on [b]Wikipedia Becomes Easier[/b]
eReleases (press release)
NEW YORK, Nov. 18, 2010 — Wikipedia, the most popular reference site on the Internet, has nearly 400 million unique visitors each month and is consulted ...



View the article
A User
QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Thu 18th November 2010, 9:49pm) *

<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Getting Visibility on [b]Wikipedia Becomes Easier[/b]
eReleases (press release)
NEW YORK, Nov. 18, 2010 — Wikipedia, the most popular reference site on the Internet, has nearly 400 million unique visitors each month and is consulted ...

<a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&ned=us&ncl=dcG7MW6sm-p3tDM" target="_blank"></a>

View the article



Looks like Wikipedia Review has a competitor.
thekohser
QUOTE(WikiWatch @ Thu 18th November 2010, 6:34am) *

Looks like Wikipedia Review has a competitor.

Lord & Taylor didn't put Wal-Mart out of business.

QUOTE
The service is surprisingly affordable, with only $295 for article creation and posting, and only $99 per month for continuous monitoring and maintenance.
SB_Johnny
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 18th November 2010, 7:46am) *

QUOTE(WikiWatch @ Thu 18th November 2010, 6:34am) *

Looks like Wikipedia Review has a competitor.

Lord & Taylor didn't put Wal-Mart out of business.

QUOTE
The service is surprisingly affordable, with only $295 for article creation and posting, and only $99 per month for continuous monitoring and maintenance.


Maybe you're undercharging. The prius sells better than the metro did.
Kelly Martin
So Jimmy will be blocking all of their editors, just as he did Greg, when he did the same thing? Fair is fair, after all.
thekohser
Wait, wait, wait a minute. I'm doomed!

This new enterprise runs circles around mine, because Wikipedia Review doesn't have an explicit Code of Ethics, with a focus on "DESINFORMATION":

QUOTE
Wikipediaexperts’ Code of Ethics

When considering retaining services of WikipediaExperts, please keep in mind that we strictly adhere to NEUTRALITY principle of Wikipedia. In other words, we are getting paid for consultation, research, writing, but will not deviate from Wikipedia principles of Neutral Point of View, Notability, Verifiability, and No Original Research. Just like financial auditors, we charge for our time, but with explicit requirement of UNCOMPROMISED INTEGRITY.

Our services are intended for companies who have verifiably good products and services. We see submitting verifiable INFORMATION to Wikipedia as a large business niche and implement strict internal rules designed to preclude uploading any DESINFORMATION or biased content.


thekohser
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Thu 18th November 2010, 9:53am) *

So Jimmy will be blocking all of their editors, just as he did Greg, when he did the same thing? Fair is fair, after all.

Someone should reach out to Jimbo's Talk page and ask him!
lilburne
Wouldn't surprise me if everyone on ArbComm is signing up.
thekohser
Interesting that this business' parent company, KMGi, is headed by the same guy heading up WikipediaExperts. And when you contact KMGi (who has worked with such brands as Canon, Volvo, Boeing, DuPont, and MTV)...

228 Park Ave South #16065
New York, NY 10003

T: 212.202.0793

...you discover that so many people want to do business with this guy, his voice mailbox is full and cannot accept any new messages!
Emperor
With Godwin gone, who's going to go after them for using the "Wikipedia" name?
Zoloft
This dubious enterprise comes to us, replete with standard Eastern European grammar artifacts, courtesy of Alex Konanykhin (T-H-L-K-D).

Well, chill my borscht, his own article has a lot of problems!

Physician, heal thyself.

Perhaps I should contact him and offer to correct the errors and image resolution problems on his website for a 'surprisingly affordable' fee.

His WP article I'll leave to the highly trained weasels.
thekohser
QUOTE(Zoloft @ Thu 18th November 2010, 12:37pm) *

This dubious enterprise comes to us, replete with standard Eastern European grammar artifacts, courtesy of Alex Konanykhin (T-H-L-K-D).


Interesting who created that article, seemed to have a single purpose.
thekohser
Even Anne "Risker" Clin seems to be crumbling to the pressure of money meaning quality and volunteerism meaning crap.
Milton Roe
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 18th November 2010, 11:02am) *

Even Anne "Risker" Clin seems to be crumbling to the pressure of money meaning quality and volunteerism meaning crap.

QUOTE(Risker)
My teeth grate when I think that some people are getting paid to do what so
many of us do simply for the joy of sharing.


Risker goes on: It's like prostitution, I tell you! That's why I myself am a volunteer hospital candy-striperstripper, instead of a highly-paid professional hospital staff-whore....
thekohser
This two-person corporate team really seems to get around. Nice websites that I've never heard of!
carbuncle
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 18th November 2010, 5:42pm) *

QUOTE(Zoloft @ Thu 18th November 2010, 12:37pm) *

This dubious enterprise comes to us, replete with standard Eastern European grammar artifacts, courtesy of Alex Konanykhin (T-H-L-K-D).


Interesting who created that article, seemed to have a single purpose.


For the lurking WP admins who can't be bothered to figure out the socks for themselves:
the aforementioned User:Jdr123
User:Haengbokhada
User:Camper-mann
User:68.192.77.177
User:Graceconcepcionr

Long time editor User:Eclipsed is in there like a dirty shirt. Eclipsed seems to have taken a short editing break from September of 2008 until October of 2010, when they started taking a real interest in creating new articles. User:Sigma0 1 is a possible sock of theirs.

More: Commons editor Konanykhin makes their sole edit on 17:50, 6 November 2010, uploading an image of themselves. A few hours later, Eclipsed makes their first edit on Commons ("hello world") and then adds a category to the Alex Konanykhin image.
thekohser
I have a feeling this guy is lying about his entire life story. It just doesn't check out in the News archives.

Wait, if you spell it "Alexandre Konanykhine", you do get stuff like...
QUOTE

Russian Money Weaves a Tangled Web; Dealings of Businessman Wanted by Moscow and Given U.S. Asylum Draw Investigators' Interest
[FINAL Edition]
The Washington Post - Washington, D.C.
Author: Douglas Farah
Date: Sep 19, 1999
Start Page: A.27
Section: A SECTION
Text Word Count: 1702

The businessman was Alexandre Konanykhine, now 33, who said he was vice president of Menatep Bank, a large, politically connected institution. Known within the CIA as "The Kid," Konanykhine had been identified by the U.S. spy agency as a friend of, and political fund- raiser for, Russian President Boris Yeltsin.

Konanykhine (pronounced Koh-Nah-NEE-Kin) also was believed by U.S. intelligence officials to be a member of a select group of former Communist youth activists dubbed the "Miracle Boys." Law enforcement officials and Russian experts said the group was picked by the KGB, the former Soviet Union's intelligence service, to help move billions of dollars outside of Russia. Konanykhine vigorously denies that he was a member of the "Miracle Boys" or had any affiliation with the KGB.

But Konanykhine didn't give up. Nine months later, in June 1994, he set up an Internet financial institution called European Union Bank. Though ostensibly based in the Caribbean island of Antigua, its computer hard drive, containing all the bank's records, was in a Washington apartment rented by one of Konanykhine's associates. Konanykhine lived in a $300,000 co-op at the Watergate at the time, and drove expensive cars.


Sounds like trouble, whatever the real story is.
tarantino
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 18th November 2010, 9:02pm) *

Sounds like trouble, whatever the real story is.


If you're interested, read the testimony of Yuri Shvets before the US House of Representatives. It's quite a story, and it doesn't exactly match up with Konanykhine's wp bio.

More also here http://www.lexisweb.com/Search.aspx?Query=Konanykhine
thekohser
QUOTE(tarantino @ Thu 18th November 2010, 4:42pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 18th November 2010, 9:02pm) *

Sounds like trouble, whatever the real story is.


If you're interested, read the testimony of Yuri Shvets before the US House of Representatives. It's quite a story, and it doesn't exactly match up with Konanykhine's wp bio.

More also here http://www.lexisweb.com/Search.aspx?Query=Konanykhine


Very interesting. Yuri Shvets' own sworn testimony says, "In his re[c]ent appearance on CBS’ 60 Minutes, on 19 September 1999, Konanykhine acknowledged that $1 billion was stolen from Russia through the All-Russia Exchange Bank. Konanykhine was not a mastermind of the crime. However, given the information available to me at this point I strongly believe that he was an accomplice, who knowingly participated in the crime."

But Wikipedia says, "Both Rizzi and Shvets testified that they had serious doubts about the charges that had been filed against Konanykhin by Volvodez and the American government."

Ain't Wikipedia great?
tarantino
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Thu 18th November 2010, 8:26pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 18th November 2010, 5:42pm) *

QUOTE(Zoloft @ Thu 18th November 2010, 12:37pm) *

This dubious enterprise comes to us, replete with standard Eastern European grammar artifacts, courtesy of Alex Konanykhin (T-H-L-K-D).


Interesting who created that article, seemed to have a single purpose.


For the lurking WP admins who can't be bothered to figure out the socks for themselves:
the aforementioned User:Jdr123
User:Haengbokhada
User:Camper-mann
User:68.192.77.177
User:Graceconcepcionr

Long time editor User:Eclipsed is in there like a dirty shirt. Eclipsed seems to have taken a short editing break from September of 2008 until October of 2010, when they started taking a real interest in creating new articles. User:Sigma0 1 is a possible sock of theirs.

More: Commons editor Konanykhin makes their sole edit on 17:50, 6 November 2010, uploading an image of themselves. A few hours later, Eclipsed makes their first edit on Commons ("hello world") and then adds a category to the Alex Konanykhin image.


Don't worry about Konanykhin's bio any more. The crotchety librarian David Goodman Image has turned his attention to it.

QUOTE
David Goodman dgoodmanny at gmail.com
Fri Nov 19 00:05:46 UTC 2010
Most current paid editing gets deleted at Speedy, simply because the
organization has no serious claim to being notable. People who
deliberately write paid articles on topics they know hopeless are
unethical; if they write them without knowing, they are incompetent.
But this sort of thing is not the current problem, for it's no more
difficult to handle than the even larger amount of similar articles by
volunteer editors.

…

As for the proprietor of this service, I've just been removing from
the article on him article one of the clear signs of COI/promotional
editing , the excessive use of his name.


Well, then again, maybe you should. DGG can't even copyedit his emails.
thekohser
For Goodman to say, "Most current paid editing gets deleted at Speedy...", wouldn't that mean he has to be aware of all current paid editing activity?

Do you think he could even name 3 of my last 10 paid editing articles?
EricBarbour
FYI, the KMGI company has a reputation for sleazy dealings.

Konanykhin is a very typical "New Russian" "businessman"--
his old Soviet-era connections make him "better" than his peers.
You might also find this interesting.

Try searching ripoffreport.com for his name--plenty of complaints about his activities.
thekohser
KMGi's website claims that it is "...the preferred Interactive Production Studio of the American Association of Advertising Agencies."

I just received an e-mail from the #2 guy at AAAA. He says their counsel will be sending a cease and desist <edit: to KMGi> on Monday.
carbuncle
QUOTE(thekohser @ Sat 20th November 2010, 9:05pm) *

KMGi's website claims that it is "...the preferred Interactive Production Studio of the American Association of Advertising Agencies."

I just received an e-mail from the #2 guy at AAAA. He says their counsel will be sending a cease and desist on Monday.

Sending a cease and desist to whom? What do they wish you to cease and desist doing? Nevermind, I misread who was sending the C&D to whom.

Incidentally, I started a new thread about this here.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.