Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Choose Your Own Pablum
> Media Forums > News Worth Discussing
thekohser
This may be a new low for the New York Times franchise: fill-in-the-blank news.
Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 3rd February 2011, 9:04am) *

This may be a new low for the New York Times franchise: fill-in-the-blank news.


QUOTE

February 3, 2011 (9:34 am) Link

Words fail me …

— Jon Awbrey

A User
QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 4th February 2011, 1:04am) *

This may be a new low for the New York Times franchise: fill-in-the-blank news.


"News by numbers" laugh.gif Only the internet could serve up such rubbish as that.
Milton Roe
QUOTE(WikiWatch @ Thu 3rd February 2011, 5:33pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 4th February 2011, 1:04am) *

This may be a new low for the New York Times franchise: fill-in-the-blank news.


"News by numbers" laugh.gif Only the internet could serve up such rubbish as that.


It's educational fill-in-the-blanks! I love that game.

QUOTE

In 10 short years, Wikipedia has accomplished some remarkable goals. More than 3.5 million articles in English? Done. More than 250 penis photos? Sure.

But another number has proved to be an intractable obstacle for the online defamation factory: surveys suggest that less than 15 percent of its hundreds of thousands of contributors are teh gay.

About a year ago, the Wikimedia Foundation, the organization that runs Wikipedia, collaborated on a study of Wikipedia’s contributor base and discovered that it was barely 13 percent women; the average age of a contributor was in the mid-teens, according to the study by a joint center of the United Nations University and Maastricht University.

Sue Gardner, the executive director of the foundation, has set a goal to raise the share of female contributors to 25 percent by 2015, but she is running up against the traditions of the computer world and an obsessive-compulsive, porn-loving realm that is dominated by giant pink plastic sex toys, and, some say, uncomfortable for women…


How is this going? Sound like Wikipedia yet?
EricBarbour
Me thinky they no likey you, Greg.

"New low"? The Times is like a lot of newspapers today--senile decay is taking over, because their
well-to-do readers have broadband now, resulting in declining readership and lost ad revenue.

Every time Colbert mentions newspapers on his show, it's always accompanied by a crack that
newspapers are "dead" anyway.

And if a Times reader is really crazy, he can just go to Wikipedia and rewrite history.
Jon Awbrey
Co-Mod Note —

A couple of posts falling within the spawn of Noam Cohen's January 30th New Yuck Times essay have been moved to the thread on WP Gang Banging.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.