Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Does The NY Times Donate To Wikipedia For Being A Massive Source Of Information?
> Media Forums > News Worth Discussing
Newsfeed
Does The NY Times Donate To Wikipedia For Being A Massive Source Of Information?

Techdirt
Every journalist I've spoken to since 2006 uses Wikipedia as their handy universal backgrounder. Funnily enough, there's a distinct lack of donations to the Wikimedia Foundation from newspapers and media organisations. How much did the New York Times …
thekohser
David Gerard in the lead, and Fred Bauder in the comments.

We're such a boring and predictable Wikipedia support (and critique) community, aren't we?
Milton Roe
QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Wed 23rd March 2011, 10:46am) *

Does The NY Times Donate To Wikipedia For Being A Massive Source Of Information?

Techdirt
Every journalist I've spoken to since 2006 uses Wikipedia as their handy universal backgrounder. Funnily enough, there's a distinct lack of donations to the Wikimedia Foundation from newspapers and media organisations. How much did the New York Times …


Plenty of journalists and newspapers are laughable today, and even some of the problems they have, could be fixed by using lowly Wikipedia. Some of them do NOT use it. That's how bad they are. Not only are they bad, but arrogant and bad, too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/02/opinion/02pubed.html

If your obit disagrees with Wikipedia on when men first landed on the Moon, you probably should check out a third source. ermm.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.